Oncology
-
To evaluate the therapeutic activity of 24-hour continuously infused 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by high-dose folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had recurred or progressed following mainly bolus 5-FU/folinic acid chemotherapy. ⋯ Continuous infusion of 5-FU/folinic acid displays activity in pretreated and refractory colorectal cancer with acceptable toxicity. Patients who had achieved disease stabilization or objective remission with previous 5-FU bolus therapy appear to be more likely to benefit from second-line treatment. Questions remaining to be addressed include the optimal starting dose of continuously infused 5-FU and whether the dose of folinic acid can be reduced or completely eliminated with respect to toxicity and health economics.
-
Primary mediastinal large cell lymphoma is a distinctive subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Computed tomography (CT) has become an integral part of the evaluation of these patients at presentation and after completion of therapy. The purpose of this study is to identify CT features that predict increased risk of relapse. ⋯ CT plays an important role in predicting outcome in primary mediastinal large cell lymphoma. Large residual tumor volume after completion of treatment predicts an increased risk of relapse.
-
Clinical Trial
Heated intraoperative intraperitoneal mitomycin C and early postoperative intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil: pharmacokinetic studies.
The purpose of this study was to report the pharmacokinetics of heated intraoperative intraperitoneal mitomycin C (MMC) and to analyze the impact of heat, extent of peritoneal resections, and effect of intraoperative hyperthermic chemotherapy on the pharmacological properties of the peritoneal plasma barrier. ⋯ Heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy achieves high peritoneal concentrations of MMC with limited systemic absorption. Systemic drug absorption during heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is increased when extensive peritoneal resections are performed, but such slight increases are unlikely to change the risk of systemic drug toxicities. Heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy does not alter the pharmacokinetics of early postoperative intraperitoneal 5-FU.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of ondansetron (GR38032F) plus dexamethasone with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of nausea and emesis induced by carboplatin chemotherapy.
A double-blind, parallel-group study in 189 ovarian cancer patients compared the efficacy of ondansetron 8 mg i.v. (OND) and metoclopramide 60 mg i.v. (MET) both in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. in the prevention of carboplatin-induced emesis. On day 1, complete or major control of emesis (0-2 emetic episodes) was observed in 97% patients from the OND group compared with 74% patients from the MET group (p < 0.001). Similarly, a worst-day analysis over days 1-3 showed complete or major control of emesis in 87% patients (OND) compared wth 66% patients (MET) (p < 0.001). ⋯ Fewer patients from the OND group (13%) reported adverse events compared with the MET group (21%). Extrapyramidal type symptoms were observed in 6 (6%) patients from the MET group (paraesthesia, involuntary movement of the jaw and tongue, and restlessness), compared with none from the OND group. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment and is significantly superior to metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in the prevention of carboplatin-induced emesis.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of two different doses of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis.
This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two different doses of ondansetron (8 mg vs. 24 mg) plus dexamethasone in the prevention of cisplatin (CDDP)-induced emesis and nausea (acute and delayed). The persistence of the anti-emetic efficacy during the second cycle of chemotherapy was also assessed. Eighty patients receiving high-dose CDDP (>80 mg/m2) were randomized to have either ondansetron 8 mg plus dexamethasone 20 mg (8 mg group) or ondansetron 24 mg plus dexamethasone 20 mg (24 mg group), given intravenously as a single dose before the CDDP infusion. ⋯ The figures for the delayed nausea were: 12 (48%) and 13 (50%), 2 (15.4%) and 2 (18.2%), respectively. Similar protection against emesis and nausea was recorded during the second cycle of chemotherapy. Both regimens have the same efficacy and thus, taking into account the cost-effectiveness, 8 mg of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in a single intravenous dose should be used for the prevention of high-dose CDDP-induced emesis.