The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
The Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey has been shown to be a valid instrument when used to measure the self-reported physical and mental health of patients. The impact of lumbar spinal disorders can be assessed as the difference between the SF-36 scale scores and age- and gender-specific population norms. ⋯ All four lumbar spine disorders have a significant negative impact on all eight of the SF-36 scales. The greatest negative impact was seen in those scales that measure physical health (role limitations due to physical symptoms [RP], physical functioning [PF], and bodily pain [BP]). The HNP diagnostic group experienced a significantly greater impact upon these three scales. This diagnostic group had the youngest patients, whose baseline physical functional status would be expected to be the most optimal. When we stratified by age in all the diagnostic groups, the greatest negative impact scores for physical health were seen in the <40 years and 40-60 years age groups. These patients were also more likely to perceive their health as poor, experience decreased energy, and have more social impairment when compared with their age/gender norms.
-
Assessment of patients with complaints of low back or leg pain varies with the subspecialty of the treating physician. The evaluation of the spine patient may include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bone scan, or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. The interpretation of these tests and the examiner's biases will impact the outcome of patient treatment and the cost to the health-care system. ⋯ MRI interpretation of the lumbar spine is comparable between specialties. Nuclear imaging studies (bone scan/SPECT) demonstrated a poorer correlation between examiners. The presence of MRI changes enables an accurate prediction of bone scan or SPECT scan findings. SPECT scan demonstrates an increased sensitivity in the detection of spinal abnormalities and the ability to localize a lesion when compared with planar bone scan.
-
Although thoracic disc herniations are rare, misdiagnosis is an undesirable situation, as it results not only in unnecessary diagnostic studies and surgical procedures, but also in progressive myelopathy and paralysis. Therefore, it is important to be aware of patients with thoracic disc herniations presenting with unusual or atypical symptoms mimicking other non-spinal disorders. ⋯ Thoracic disc herniation should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with pain likely caused by nonspinal disorders, especially if basic diagnostic studies do not reveal the cause.
-
A pedicle subtraction osteotomy can be considered as part of the surgical treatment of a symptomatic sagittal imbalance. The literature on the use of this technique is limited and thus far not applied to a rigid thoracolumbar hyperkyphosis. ⋯ A pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a technically demanding but well tolerated operative procedure for the correction of a kyphotic deformity. This technique can also be considered as an adjunctive tool in the surgical treatment of a rigid thoracolumbar (Scheuermann's) kyphosis.
-
It is known that positioning patients on the Jackson and Andrews operative tables causes changes in lumbar lordosis and pelvic rotation. However, it is unknown if the relationship between the iliac crest and underlying lumbar levels, in particular the L4-L5 interspace, changes from standing to prone on these tables. ⋯ Approximately 30% of patients demonstrated changes in the relationship between the iliac crest and lumbar levels between standing and positioning prone. The intraoperative position of the iliac crest aligned more accurately with the L4/L4-L5 spine level on the Jackson and Andrews frame compared with preoperative standing radiographs respectively. Further biomechanical studies should investigate the implication for lumbopelvic fixation.