The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Concern about improper payments to chiropractic physicians prompted the US Department of Health and Human Services to describe chiropractic services as a "significant vulnerability" for Medicare, but little is known about trends in the use and cost of chiropractic spinal manipulation provided under Medicare. ⋯ Chiropractic claims account for less than 1/10th of 1% of overall Medicare expenditures. Allowed services, allowed charges, and fee-for-service payments for chiropractic spinal manipulation under Medicare Part B generally increased from 2002, peaked in 2005 and 2006, and then declined through 2008. Per user spending for chiropractic spinal manipulation also declined by 18% from 2006 to 2008, in contrast to 10% growth in total spending per beneficiary and 16% growth in overall Medicare spending.
-
Comparative Study
C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis.
Instrumentation of C1 is becoming increasingly common. Starting points initially described for C1 lateral mass screws at the lateral mass/posterior arch junction are technically challenging. Recently, a number of techniques have evolved advocating varying starting points and trajectories. Despite being technically easier, there are new safety concerns. Insufficient evidence exists for optimal C1 lateral mass screw placement with starting points in the posterior arch. ⋯ C1 lateral mass screws could be virtually placed bilaterally in each of 100 clinical cases without violating critical structures. However, none of the previously described approaches worked in every case because of significant anatomic variability. The vertical starting point was particularly critical, and vertebral groove height was the most limiting variable. Although a reliable safe zone could be found in every case, preoperative planning is essential to avoid critical structures.
-
Case Reports
"Artifactual fracture-subluxation" of cervical spine in computed tomography screening sans plain radiographs.
Computed tomography (CT) has become the sole modality of screening for cervical injury in polytrauma because of the high sensitivity, speed, and convenience, thereby eliminating the need for plain radiographs. ⋯ Motion artifact in cervical CT screening can lead to a misdiagnosis of fracture subluxation. Duplication of soft tissue is highly suggestive of this motion artifact, and an additional single lateral plain radiograph may avert this pitfall.