The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The comparison of pedicle screw and cortical screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial.
Pedicle screws (PS) offer great benefits in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), but several drawbacks of PS, including the risk of superior facet joint violation and muscle injury, have also pointed out. Recently, cortical screws (CS) were invented, which can be placed without the drawbacks associated with PS. However, whether CS in PLIF can provide similar or greater clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to those of PS has not been fully evaluated in clinical research studies. ⋯ CS in PLIF provides similar clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to PS in PLIF. On the basis of the present study, we suggest CS to be a reasonable alternative to PS in PLIF.
-
Proteus syndrome (PS) is an extremely rare congenital disorder causing asymmetric overgrowth of different tissues. The etiology remains unclear. Limb deformities are common and often necessitate amputations. Only a few cases associated with spinal deformities have been described. ⋯ Proteus syndrome can be associated with spinal stenosis and deformity. Although the syndrome can be progressive in nature, the symptomatic spinal pathology should be treated appropriately.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Postdural puncture headache: impact of needle type, a randomized trial.
The most common adverse event after a lumbar puncture (LP) is a headache: In anaesthesiology, well studied is the protective effect of atraumatic spinal needles, and they are routinely used. However, this is less well known in diagnostic LP, and neurologists use atraumatic needles in less than 2% of times. ⋯ We found a lower incidence of PDPH with atraumatic needles, and it was statistically significant compared with the traumatic needles. Our study confirms the effectiveness of the atraumatic needles to prevent PDPH.
-
Comparative Study Controlled Clinical Trial
Restoration of the spinopelvic sagittal balance in isthmic spondylolisthesis: posterior lumbar interbody fusion may be better than posterolateral fusion.
More and more orthopedic surgeons recognize the importance of the sagittal balance of the spine. ⋯ Either PLF or PLIF would lead a great change in spinopelvic parameters and deformity parameters. The decrease of PT may be an important role for the short-term surgical outcome. The PLIF could increase the LL and form a more reasonable sagittal alignment. From the point of the sagittal spinopelvic balance, the PLIF may be better than the PLF for patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis.
-
There is growing concern that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) commonly used in clinical research evaluating treatments such as epidural steroid injections (ESIs) for lumbar spinal stenosis may not adequately capture outcomes of greatest importance to older adults. ⋯ Older adults with spinal stenosis rated problems related to pain and physical function as the most important outcomes to them. However, difficulty exercising and difficulty participating in hobbies and leisure activities were also among the most highly rated and were two areas not typically assessed in treatment studies. Commonly used PROs in spinal stenosis treatment studies may be insufficient to comprehensively assess outcomes from the patient perspective.