The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of toxicity effects of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lidocaine on rabbit intervertebral disc cells in vitro.
It has been shown that bupivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic to relieve or control pain in interventional spine procedures, is cytotoxic to intervertebral disc (IVD) cells in vitro. However, some other common local anesthetics, such as ropivacaine and lidocaine, are also frequently used in the treatment of spine-related pain, and the potential effects of these agents remain unclear. ⋯ Results show that bupivacaine and lidocaine decrease cell viability in rabbit IVD cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. All local anesthetics should be avoided if at all possible. Ropivacaine may be a choice if necessary, but it is also toxic. The increase in cell death is more related with cell necrosis rather than cell apoptosis. If these results can be corroborated in tissue explant models or animal studies, caution regarding diagnosing, treating, and controlling spine-related pain with local anesthetics is prompted.
-
Carragee et al. reported an accelerated progression of lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration after discography in a human trial. Local anesthetics and contrast agents have exhibited toxicity to cardiac, renal, and neuronal cells. We hypothesize that local anesthetics or contrast agents commonly injected into the disc space during discography may result in cytotoxicity in vitro. In this study, we compared the cytotoxicity of these agents, alone or in combination, using nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) cells in a three-dimensional (3D) culture system. ⋯ Cell death was observed when AF and NP cells were incubated in a dose- and time-dependent manner with local anesthetics and contrast agents commonly used for discography. Relative toxicity of these compounds was noted in the order of bupivacaine, lidocaine, iopamidol, and iohexol. Future studies of the effects of these agents in organ culture or animal models are indicated to predict what happens in vivo.
-
Although the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) with scaffolds for bone repair has been considered an effective method, the interactions between implanted materials and bone tissues have not been fully elucidated. At some specific sites, such as the vertebral body (VB) of the spine, the process of bone repair with implanted biomaterials is rarely reported. Recently, adipose tissue was found to be an alternative source of MSC besides bone marrow. However, the strategy of using adipose-derived stromal (ADS) cells with bioactive scaffold for the repair of spinal bone defects has seldom been studied. ⋯ Adipose-derived stromal cells maintained in culture on a scaffold and treated with osteogenic induction with growth factor ex vivo could be used to enhance bone repair in vivo.
-
Osteoconductive porous ceramic bone graft materials supplemented with mesenchymal precursor cells (MPC) derived from autologous bone marrow aspirates have been shown to stimulate successful interbody and posterolateral spine fusion in preclinical models. Recent advances in immunomagnetic cell sorting have enabled purification and isolation of pluripotent stem cells from marrow aspirates and have expanded stem cell technology to allogeneic cell sources. Allogeneic MPC technology combined with appropriate synthetic biomaterial carriers could provide both the osteogenic and osteoconductive components needed for successful posterolateral spine fusion without the need for autologous bone harvest or expensive recombinant protein technology. ⋯ Adult allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells delivered via a hydroxyapatite:tricalcium phosphate carrier were both safe and efficacious in this ovine spine fusion model. Results from this preclinical study support that allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells produced fusion efficacy similar to that achieved using iliac crest autograft, thereby providing a safe and viable option to achieve successful posterolateral spine fusion.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry.
The possibility and likelihood of a postoperative medical complication after spine surgery undoubtedly play a major role in the decision making of the surgeon and patient alike. Although prior study has determined relative risk and odds ratio values to quantify risk factors, these values may be difficult to translate to the patient during counseling of surgical options. Ideally, a model that predicts absolute risk of medical complication, rather than relative risk or odds ratio values, would greatly enhance the discussion of safety of spine surgery. To date, there is no risk stratification model that specifically predicts the risk of medical complication. ⋯ We present a validated model for predicting medical complications after spine surgery. The value in this model is that it gives the user an absolute percent likelihood of complication after spine surgery based on the patient's comorbidity profile and invasiveness of surgery. Patients are far more likely to understand an absolute percentage, rather than relative risk and confidence interval values. A model such as this is of paramount importance in counseling patients and enhancing the safety of spine surgery. In addition, a tool such as this can be of great use particularly as health care trends toward pay-for-performance, quality metrics, and risk adjustment. To facilitate the use of this model, we have created a website (SpineSage.com) where users can enter in patient data to determine likelihood of medical complications after spine surgery.