The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Multicenter Study
Is it safe to stop at C7 during multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion? - multicenter analysis.
Despite a number of studies addressing the anatomical and biomechanical challenges of long segment, posterior cervical fusion surgery, recommendations for appropriate caudal "end level" vary widely. ⋯ Caudal end level did not significantly affect revision rates, patient reported outcomes or radiographic outcomes. Higher EBL, OR, and LOS in group II suggest that, absent focal C7-T1 pathology, extension of posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may not be necessary. Extension of posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may be recommended for higher risk patients with limitations to strong C7 bone anchorage. In others, it is safe to stop at C7.
-
Multicenter Study
How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?
The lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) determination in Lenke type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) requires a thorough understanding and prediction of the correction force on the LIV from coronal, sagittal, and axial plane. Although many LIV selection criteria have been reported, none of them comprehensively evaluated the multidimensional characteristics of the LIV till now. ⋯ The present study indicates using our LIV criteria, our study achieved the correction rate of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve as 88.9%, with the rate of adding on or coronal imbalance as 8.7% (12/138). The criteria may provide important guidance for preoperative decision-making in Lenke 5 AIS patients, and more multicenter prospective studies with larger samples are needed to further validate the findings of this study.
-
Expandable cages (EXP) are being more frequently utilized in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF). EXP were designed to reduce complications related to neurological retraction, enable better lordosis restoration, and improve ease of insertion, particularly in the advent of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques, however they are exponentially more expensive than the nonexpandable (NE) alternative. ⋯ Once technique was controlled for, TLIFs utilizing EXP do not have significantly improved neurologic or radiographic outcomes compared with NE. EXP increase risk of intraoperative subsidence. These results question the value of the EXP given the higher cost.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between alternative-level and all-level fixation unilateral open-door laminoplasty.
Titanium mini-plate has been used in unilateral open-door laminoplasty to maintain the open angle of laminae. Previously, both all-level fixation (C3-C7) and alternative-level (C3, C5, C7) unilateral open-door laminoplasty have been proven to have satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, whether they could achieve similar long-term clinical and radiographic efficacy is still questionable. ⋯ Despite a difference in the maintenance of open angle, both fixation methods achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes. We believe alternative-level fixation is also a safe, effective, and economical fixation method.
-
Postoperative C5 palsy is not an uncommon complication in patients who undergo expansive open-door laminoplasty. However, the etiology is unclear and likely multifactorial. Nerve root lesions and spinal cord lesions have been previously proposed theories. ⋯ This study provides clinicians with a more detailed understanding of the anatomic structure and potential mechanism of C5 palsy. Consideration of the meningovertebral ligaments and the intervertebral foramen may provide new directions for reducing the incidence of this complication.