Articles: analgesics.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of diclofenac and tenoxicam for postoperative analgesia with and without fentanyl in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy.
127 children scheduled for elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with a volatile agent. At induction the child received either rectal diclofenac 1 mg.kg-1 with or without fentanyl 0.75 microgram.kg-1 i.v., or intravenous tenoxicam 0.4 mg.kg-1 with or without fentanyl 0.75 microgram.kg-1 i.v. ⋯ Pain scores in the tenoxicam without fentanyl group were significantly higher in recovery (P < 0.05) than the diclofenac group without fentanyl and both fentanyl groups. This group required supplemental analgesia earlier although this was not significant. The pain scores in the diclofenac with fentanyl group were significantly lower at one h and four h than the group receiving diclofenac alone (P = 0.008 and 0.02 respectively).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Post-operative intravenous continuous analgesia: comparison of buprenorphine, fentanyl and nalbuphine.
Continuous intravenous infusions of fentanyl, buprenorphine or nalbuphine were investigated to provide pain relief for patients after major abdominal surgery. Buprenorphine (n = 23) was given as a loading dose of 5 micrograms kg-1 and infused at 0.8 micrograms kg-1 h-1. Fentanyl (n = 20) was given as a loading dose of 2 micrograms kg-1 and infused at 0.7 micrograms kg-1 h-1. ⋯ The infusion rate was increased when analgesia was inadequate, and decreased if respiratory depression occurred. Mean doses were respectively 0.74 +/- 0.15 microgram kg-1 h-1 buprenorphine, 0.68 +/- 0.18 microgram kg-1 h-1 fentanyl, 83 +/- 21 micrograms kg-1 h-1 nalbuphine. Titration of continuous intravenous infusion of buprenorphine and fentanyl provided better analgesia than nalbuphine with smaller doses than those reported in similar studies allowing spontaneous breathing.
-
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPostoperative analgesic effects of an external cooling system and intra-articular bupivacaine/morphine after arthroscopic cruciate ligament surgery.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of an external cooling system with or without the combined effect of intra-articularly administered bupivacaine/morphine after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty patients with isolated ACL insufficiency operated on under general anaesthesia were randomized to three different postoperative treatment groups. Group I was treated with the cooling system during the first 24 h after surgery and an intra-articular injection of 20 ml of physiological saline given at the completion of surgery; in group II, the cooling system was combined with an intra-articular injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml and 1 mg of morphine at the end of the operation; while group III (placebo group) received an intra-articular injection of 20 ml of physiological saline at the completion of surgery. ⋯ No complications due to the use of the cooling system or the intra-articular injections of bupivacaine/morphine were observed. The external cooling system used in this study provides an effective method of obtaining pain relief after arthroscopic surgery. The combination with an intra-articular injection of morphine and bupivacaine results in a slightly greater analgesic effect than the cooling system alone.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialKetorolac and spinal morphine for postcesarean analgesia.
This study was designed to compare spinal morphine (SM), ketorolac (K), and a combination of the two drugs with respect to analgesic efficacy and side effects in postcesarean patients. Forty-eight parturients having bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery randomly received in a double-blind manner either: SM: 0.1 mg or SM: 0.2 mg (but no K); SM: 0.1 mg plus K 60 mg intravenously (i.v.) one hour after spinal injection, and 30 mg i.v. every 6 h for three doses or i.v. K dosed as previously described (but no SM). ⋯ Pruritus was common in all patients receiving SM whereas patients who received K had the lowest overall scores for severity of side effects. No serious complications occurred and all groups expressed similarly high satisfaction at the 24 h visit. We conclude that there is no advantage to combining SM and K, and that K provides satisfactory postcesarean analgesia with few side effects.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of electrical stimulation at different frequencies on perception and pain in human volunteers: epidural versus intravenous administration of fentanyl.
The study was performed to determine whether epidural fentanyl produced segmental sensory changes to electrical stimulation at different frequencies. Eight healthy volunteers received fentanyl 1 microgram/kg both intravenously and epidurally in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Perception thresholds and amount of current required to elicit a predetermined level of moderate pain (Cmp) at 5,250, and 2000 Hz stimulation were measured at ipsilateral dermatomes C2 and L2 at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after injection. ⋯ In contrast, epidural fentanyl increased Cmp only at the L2 dermatome and only at 5 Hz (P = 0.005). We conclude that an epidural bolus of fentanyl results in segmental spinal analgesia to transcutaneous electrical stimulation only at specific frequencies. Furthermore, pain produced by stimulation at 5 Hz may have a different pharmacology than pain produced by 250 Hz stimulation.