Articles: analgesics.
-
Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. · Jan 1984
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of a traditional paracetamol medication and a new paracetamol/paracetamol-methionine ester combination.
The SUR 2647 combination is a sachet formulation containing free paracetamol and its N-acetyl-methionate ester (SUR 2647). In a randomized, single-blind, between-patient study the onset of analgesia, duration and efficacy of the SUR 2647 combination vs paracetamol was investigated in out-patients after oral surgery. One group (n = 27) received sachets of SUR 2647 combination 2 b.i.d. (equivalent to 2 g paracetamol X 2) on the day of operation, and one sachet b.i.d. (equivalent to 1 g paracetamol X 2) for the following two days. ⋯ Mean pain scores showed that the SUR 2647 combination regime reduced pain significantly more than the paracetamol regime from 0.5 to 3.0 h after initiation of medication. The mean pain scores did not show a significant difference during the remaining observation period. Mild to moderate drowsiness was reported in both treatment groups, but it was more common in subjects given SUR 2647 combination.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Ciramadol--a new synthetic analgesic. A double-blind comparison with oral codeine for postoperative pain relief.
One hundred and eighty patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists rating 1-2) received one of three oral analgesics--ciramadol (Wy. 15705) 20 mg, ciramadol 60 mg or codeine 60 mg--on a double-blind random basis for the relief of pain 24-48 hours after major general surgical, gynaecological or orthopaedic operations. All three analgesics proved equally effective and caused mild sedation only. No patient showed signs of clinical cardiorespiratory depression, and other side-effects were infrequent. Ciramadol may therefore prove a useful clinical alternative to conventional oral analgesics provided its lack of respiratory depressant properties and addiction potential in monkeys can be substantiated in humans.
-
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. · Oct 1983
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialCodeine and aspirin analgesia in postpartum uterine cramps: qualitative aspects of quantitative assessments.
The analgesic response to codeine of patients with postpartum uterine-cramp pain has recently met with controversy. To readdress this question, we conducted a new study comparing codeine sulfate, 60 mg (N = 32) and 120 mg (N = 31), with aspirin, 650 mg (N = 34), and placebo (N = 32) in hospitalized women with moderate or severe postpartum uterine cramps treated with single oral doses in a parallel, stratified, randomized, double-blind trial. Subjective reports were used as indices of response, and patients rated pain intensity, pain relief, and side effects at periodic, uniformly conducted interviews for 6 hr. ⋯ In contrast, in a subset of patients with mixed episiotomy-uterine pain (N = 73), 120 mg codeine showed good separation from placebo and compared favorably with aspirin. Codeine, 60 mg, showed a similar trend, and there was a strong suggestion of dose-dependent analgesia. Side effects were not remarkable except for dizziness and drowsiness after 120 mg codeine in all sets and subsets of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesic effects of oral propiram fumarate, codeine sulfate and placebo in postoperative pain.
Our purpose was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of propiram fumarate 50 mg, codeine sulfate 60 mg and placebo in the relief of moderate to severe postoperative pain. One hundred and twenty patients completed a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, stratified, parallel-groups trial and were observed for either 4 or 6 hours. ⋯ Two adverse effects were attributed to propiram. Propiram fumarate 50 mg is an effective oral analgesic similar to codeine sulfate 60 mg, with the possibility of a longer duration of action.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of flupirtine maleate and dihydrocodeine in patients following surgery.
Flupirtine maleate 100 mg was compared with dihydrocodeine 60 mg when given by mouth to 50 women on the first 3 days following abdominal hysterectomy in a double-blind parallel-group trial. The analgesia produced was similar for both preparations, and the consumption of active drug was the same in both groups. The only significant differences in side-effects were an increased frequency of depression in patients receiving flupirtine and of sleepiness in those receiving dihydrocodeine.