Articles: glucose-therapeutic-use.
-
Early human development · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialOral glucose and venepuncture reduce blood sampling pain in newborns.
The objectives of this study were to measure pain symptoms in healthy fullterm newborns undergoing routine blood sampling with different methods. The 120 study subjects were randomly allocated to one of four groups with 30 babies in each, namely venepuncture or heel stick, with or without oral glucose administration. ⋯ When no glucose was given crying time was 57.3 s in the heel stick group and 26.8 s in the venepuncture group (P = 0.0041) and the mean PIPP scores were 8.4 and 6.0, respectively (P = 0.0458). This study suggests that if oral glucose is given prior to skin puncture the choice of blood sampling method has no impact on the pain symptoms.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jun 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialGlucose versus lactated Ringer's solution during pediatric cardiac surgery.
Whether intraoperative fluid infusion should contain glucose during pediatric cardiac surgery remains controversial. This study was performed to compare the effects of glucose and glucose-free solutions on blood glucose and blood insulin levels during total repair of congenital heart diseases. ⋯ Glucose withdrawal during pediatric cardiac surgery induces threatening hypoglycemia during the prabypass period, and moderate intraoperative glucose administration (2.5 mg/kg/min) is not responsible for major hyperglycemia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Fructose vs. glucose in total parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients].
Parenteral nutrition required following surgery or injury should not only meet post-aggression caloric requirements but also match the specific metabolic needs so as not to worsen the metabolic disruptions already present in this situation. The primary objective of parenteral nutrition is body protein maintenance or restoration by reduction of protein catabolism or promotion of protein synthesis or both. Whether all parenteral energy donors, ie., glucose, fructose, other polyols, and lipid emulsions, are equally capable of achieving this objective continues to be a controversial issue. The objective of the present study was to answer the following questions: (1) Do glucose and fructose differ in their effects on the metabolic changes seen following surgery or injury, the changes in glucose metabolism in particular? (2) Can the observation of poorer glucose utilization in the presence of lipids be confirmed in ICU patients? ⋯ As demonstrated, parenteral fructose, unlike parenteral glucose, has a significantly less adverse impact than glucose on the glucose balance, which is disrupted initially in the post-aggression state. In addition, the less pronounced increase in insulin activity during fructose infusion than during glucose infusion can be assumed to facilitate mobilization of endogenous lipid stores and lipid oxidation. Earlier workers pointed out that any rise in free fatty acid and ketone body concentrations in the serum produces inhibition of muscular glucose uptake and oxidation, and of glycolysis. These findings were recorded in a rat model and could not be confirmed in our post-aggression state patients receiving lipid doses commensurate with the usual clinical infusion rates. The serious complications that can result from hereditary fructose intolerance are completely avoidable if a careful patient history is taken before the first parenteral use of fructose. If the patient or family members and close friends, are simply asked whether he/she can tolerate fruit and sweet dishes, hereditary fructose intolerance can be ruled out beyond all reasonable doubt. Only in the extremely rare situations in which it is not possible to question either the patient or any significant other, a test dose will have to be administered to exclude fructose intolerance. The benefits of fructose-specific metabolic effects reported in the literature and corroborated by the results of out own study suggest that fructose is an important nutrient that contributes to metabolic stabilization, especially in the post-aggression phase and in septic patients. Hyperglycaemic states are largely prevented and fewer patients require ex
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Glucose-xylitol 35% (1:1) versus glucose 40%. Effectiveness and metabolic effects after major surgery].
Injury and stress are accompanied by a characteristic hormonal response and altered energy utilisation. Hyperglycaemia and negative nitrogen (N) balance are the leading symptoms of the metabolic changes in the post-operative state. In a prospective, randomised study the efficacy and metabolic effects of glucose-xylitol (GX) 35% (1:1) versus glucose (G) 40% were investigated in patients undergoing major surgery. ⋯ Similar blood G profiles were in accordance with comparable glucagon and insulin levels. Because of the high standard deviations of N balances, differences in efficacy could not be proven. A significantly lower level of pseudocholinesterase (PCHE) for G40% on day 7 might indicate enhanced hepatic protein synthesis in the GX group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A randomized double-blind trial of dextrose-glycerine-phenol injections for chronic, low back pain.
This randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of injections of a dextrose-glycerine-phenol connective tissue proliferant into the posterior ligaments, fascia, and joint capsules to treat chronic low back pain. Seventy-nine patients with chronic low back pain that had failed to respond to previous conservative care were randomly assigned to receive a double-blind series of six injections at weekly intervals of either Xylocaine/saline solution or Xylocaine/proliferant into the posterior sacroiliac and interspinous ligaments, fascia, and joint capsules of the low back from L4 to the sacrum. Patients were observed with a visual analog, disability, and pain grid scores, and with objective computerized triaxial tests of lumbar function for 6 months following conclusion of injections. ⋯ Improvements in visual analog (p = 0.056), disability (p = 0.068), and pain grid scores (p = 0.025) were greater in the proliferant group. Objective testing of range of motion, isometric strength, and velocity of movement showed significant improvements in both groups following treatment but did not favor either group. The MRI and CT scans showed significant abnormalities in both groups, but these did not correlate with subjective complaints and were not predictive of response to treatment.