Articles: prothrombin-time.
-
World journal of surgery · May 2002
Comparative StudyValue of preoperative coagulation tests: reappraisal of major noncardiac surgery.
In a retrospective case-control review, we evaluated preoperative coagulation testing in patients undergoing major noncardiac operations to determine if routine testing benefits this group of patients. The platelet count (PC), prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in all patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery over a 22-month period were reviewed. The review was done both manually and by the computerized hospital information system. ⋯ Although (compared to controls) patients with abnormal tests had more changes in their anesthesia plan (36% vs. 2%, p < 0.001) and platelet or fresh frozen plasma transfusions (50% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), blood loss and the incidence of bleeding complications were not different. We conclude that the use of preoperative coagulation tests in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery should still be guided by clinical assessment. The surgical procedure itself does not constitute an indication for testing.
-
The CoaguChek S is the next-generation coagulation monitor for measuring the international normalized ratio (INR) that replaces the CoaguChek device. Studies are lacking comparing the CoaguChek S with local laboratory INR assessment to ensure its accuracy and precision for monitoring patients on anticoagulation. ⋯ The CoaguChek S is an accurate and precise alternative to laboratory assessment of the INR at values <4.0; it is an efficient device with a low likelihood of errors during testing.
-
Am. J. Clin. Pathol. · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPoint-of-care testing for prothrombin time, but not activated partial thromboplastin time, correlates with laboratory methods in patients receiving aprotinin or epsilon-aminocaproic acid while undergoing cardiac surgery.
Point-of-care testing (POCT) of coagulation parameters can help optimize transfusion practice in cardiac surgery. Antifibrinolytic agents may interfere with the laboratory and/or POCT coagulation assays. This randomized controlled study compared coagulation parameters obtained from a whole blood POCT coagulation device with a typical laboratory instrument in cardiac surgery patients receiving aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, or normal saline before undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. ⋯ For PT, the POCT device compared favorably with the laboratory method. For aPTT, the POCT device did not compare well with the laboratory method. Treatment with antifibrinolytic agents does not interfere with determination of PT.
-
The study examined a "percent correction" formula for evaluating mixing study results comparing a 1:1 mix with a new 4:1 mix of patient plasma with citrated normal plasma for a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and/or prothrombin time (PT). The study also examined 3 suggested definitions of correction for evaluating mixing study results for comparison. Applicability of percent correction for evaluating the aPTT 4:1 mix testing with and without incubation also was studied. ⋯ The percent correction of the aPTT 4:1 mix testing after incubation had better sensitivity and specificity that that of testing immediately. Nevertheless, these procedures were complementary to each other. The percent correction using the aPTT or PT 4:1 mix seemed to offer a simple, objective, and effective criterion for evaluating mixing study results.
-
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. · Dec 2001
Clinical TrialThe need for routine pre-operative coagulation screening tests (prothrombin time PT/partial thromboplastin time PTT) for healthy children undergoing elective tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy.
In some medical centers, the routine pre-operative evaluation of healthy children undergoing elective tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy (T and A) includes coagulation screening tests (PT, prothrombin Time; PTT, partial thromboplastin time; and INR, international normalized ratio). In this retrospective study, we determined whether there is a positive correlation between prolonged PT/PTT/INR tests in healthy children, with no prior medical history of coagulation problems, and bleeding during surgery and/or bleeding in the month following surgery. We reviewed the records of 416 elective T and A surgeries performed at the Soroka University Medical Center in Beer-Sheva, Israel, over the course of 1999. ⋯ Two (3.3%) of the 61 with prolonged PTT values experienced light bleeding during the 1st month subsequent to surgery. We therefore concluded that pre-operative coagulation screening tests provide low sensitivity and low bleeding predictive value. As such, routine coagulation tests before T &A are not indicated unless a medical history of bleeding tendency is suspected.