Articles: benzimidazoles-therapeutic-use.
-
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused primarily by mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene. Familial hypercholesterolemia is characterized by exceedingly high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and subsequent premature coronary heart disease. Homozygous FH (HoFH) is less prevalent, but more severe, than heterozygous FH. Current treatment options include dietary therapy, lipid-lowering agents (eg, statins), and/or LDL-C apheresis. ⋯ These new agents offer additional treatment options for clinicians managing patients with HoFH, but it remains uncertain whether lomitapide and mipomersen will gain FDA approval for use in patients with heterozygous FH or in the general population. Cost and concern for the risk for hepatotoxicity will remain limiting factors to these agents being more widely used.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for extended venous thromboembolism treatment: network meta-analysis.
Many new oral anticoagulants (NOACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) are currently available to treat thromboembolic disease. There are no head-to-head trials comparing these agents. To assess the efficacy and safety of NOACs for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), we performed a network meta-analysis. ⋯ There were no significant differences in risk for recurrent VTE, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality between the NOACs. However, apixaban 2.5 mg BID was associated with less clinically significant non-major bleeding than either rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or dabigatran 150 mg BID.
-
Expert Opin Drug Saf · May 2014
ReviewDabigatran etexilate for venous thromboembolism: a safety evaluation.
Recently, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have become available to treat thromboembolic disorders. The efficacy and safety of these agents have been thoroughly tested in various clinical trials. In this article, we discuss the evidence for the safety and efficacy of dabigatran in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ⋯ For most patients the overall net clinical benefit would seem to be in favour of dabigatran. Both efficacy and safety have been proven in the setting of robust randomised controlled trials. 'Real world' registry data as well as long-term trial follow-up will add further critical information. Long-term experience might be one of the few advantages warfarin still has over dabigatran in patients who are eligible for both.
-
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia and is a common cause of stroke. The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate is approved for a variety of indications requiring anticoagulation, including stroke prevention in NVAF. Dabigatran does not require routine monitoring and exhibits only a few drug-drug interactions; however, impaired renal function needs observation. ⋯ Pharmacovigilance sources prove the anticipated bleeding risk, but a refined analysis of such data showed that bleeding rates associated with dabigatran use did not appear to be higher than those associated with warfarin. Dabigatran confers an advantage over warfarin regarding stoke prevention without the burden of the surveillance of vitamin K antagonists, especially in patients with high stroke risk. However, in elderly patients with impaired renal function or considerable bleeding risks, label advice regarding dosing needs strict observation.