Articles: opioid-analgesics.
-
Curr Pain Headache Rep · Feb 2022
ReviewModulatory Effects of Stem Cells on Opioid Receptors and Neuroinflammation.
This narrative review examines stem cell therapy and its effect on opioid therapy in neuropathic pain. ⋯ Stem cell therapy has shown promise in neuropathic pain and opioid tolerance, with a notable common pathway (the P2X4 receptor). Opioid therapy frequently has poor efficacy in patients who suffer from neuropathic pain. There is evidence that the presence of neuropathic pain itself causes changes to the opioid receptor, decreasing the therapeutic potential of this modality. The efficacy of opioid therapy is further decreased in this patient population after chronic opioid exposure, which leads to opioid tolerance and in some cases opioid-induced hyperalgesia. There is growing evidence that stem cell therapy has potential to treat neuropathic pain and may simultaneously decrease opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia occurs via mu-opioid receptor-dependent expression of P2X4 receptors on microglia. Intrathecal stem cell therapy provides analgesic properties due to the significant reduction of P2X4R expression in spinal cord microglia, thereby directly decreasing chronic neuropathic pain.
-
Deaths from prescription opioids have reached epidemic levels in the United States, yet little is known about how insurers' coverage policies may affect rates of fatal and nonfatal overdose among individuals filling an opioid prescription. ⋯ Opioid utilization management among these beneficiaries was associated with mixed effects on opioid prescribing, and prior authorization was associated with a decreased likelihood of subsequent overdose. Further work exploring the impact of utilization management and insurer policies is needed.
-
To compare the 4-week effectiveness and tolerability of an add-on treatment with oral high dose methocarbamol (MET) vs long-acting oral opioid analgesics (LAO) in patients with non-specific low back pain (nsLBP) poorly responsive to recommended 1st line treatments. ⋯ 4-week add-on treatment with MET in patients with nsLBP who showed an inadequate response to recommended 1st line treatments is superior effective to LAO and significantly better tolerated.KEY MESSAGESLow back pain is the most common musculoskeletal problem worldwide.In the majority of patients, LBP does not have a specific cause and the most prevalently coded form is mechanical, non-specific (ns) LBP associated with muscular tension, restrictions in mobility, and static malposition.Current treatment recommendations for nsLBP are largely "non-specific" as well, limited to symptomatic pain-relieving measures.In our propensity score-matched two cohort analyses of depersonalized real-world data from the German Pain e-Registry, a 4-week treatment with the muscle relaxant methocarbamol proved superior effective and significantly better tolerated than treatment with oral long-acting opioid analgesics in patients who poorly responded to recommended 1st line treatments.
-
To contribute to the literature of best-practice approaches to promote full mu agonist chronic opioid analgesic therapy (COAT) cessation in a population with chronic, noncancer pain by describing initial and extended follow-up outcomes from a limited group program that utilized a standardized, multidisciplinary curriculum containing robust complementary care access in a private practice setting. ⋯ This pilot study contributes to the literature by documenting a successful and potentially generalizable strategy to promote COAT cessation, and by providing unusually lengthy follow-up for postintervention COAT cessation monitoring.
-
To characterize the effects of Michigan's controlled substance legislation on acute care prescriber behavior by specialty, in a single hospital system. ⋯ The introduction of new regulatory requirements for the prescription of controlled substances led to a general decrease in morphine equivalent milligrams prescribed in most specialties, though it may have increased the dosage of benzodiazepine prescriptions. The change in prescription behavior could be motivated by regulatory hassle or by change in attitude towards opioid prescriptions and increased recognition of opioid use disorder.