Articles: opioid-analgesics.
-
Acta neurochirurgica · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntra-operative epidural morphine, fentanyl, and droperidol for control of pain after spinal surgery. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind trial.
The present study was conducted to investigate the analgesic effects of intra-operatively administered epidural morphine in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disc disease. Three treatment groups were constituted: one with 5.0 mg morphine and 2.5 mg dehydrobenzperidol (DHB) in 10 ml physiological saline, one with 5.0 mg morphine and 0.1 mg fentanyl in the same amount of saline, and one placebo group with saline only. The test solution was injected epidurally via catheter after haemostasis and before closure of the wound. ⋯ It was shown that additional epidural fentanyl offers no significant improvement of postoperative analgesia. No significant reduction of adverse effects could be found in the morphine/droperidol group compared to the morphine/fentanyl group. In conclusion, the intra-operative epidural application of morphine is a safe, effective and simple method for achieving sufficient analgesia in the first 24 hours after lumbar spinal surgery for disc disease.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal meperidine, meperidine-bupivacaine mixture and hyperbaric bupivacaine.
To study the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal meperidine, administered either alone or mixed with bupivacaine. ⋯ Intrathecal meperidine used alone or mixed with bupivacaine has no intra-operative advantage over heavy bupivacaine 0.5%.
-
Br J Clin Pharmacol · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialContribution of monoaminergic modulation to the analgesic effect of tramadol.
1. In humans, the central analgesic effect of tramadol 100 mg orally is only partially reversed by the opioid antagonist naloxone (0.8 mg intravenously). As suggested by in vitro and animal data tramadol analgesia may thus result from an action on opioid as well as monoaminergic pathways. ⋯ Peak analgesic effect was observed at 3.7 h (RIII + 39.6 +/- 3.9% and PINS 50.1 +/- s.e.mean 5%) and the analgesia lasted about 6 h. 4. Yohimbine significantly reversed the analgesic effects of tramadol for 2.8 h with a maximum decrease of 97 +/- 4% (RIII) and 67 +/- 12% (PINS), whereas the addition of naloxone abolished tramadol effects throughout the study period with a decrease of 90 +/- 6% (RIII) and 79 +/- 9% (PINS), P < 0.05). 5. Yohimbine alone did not significantly reduce pain thresholds. 6. alpha 2-Adrenoceptor antagonism reverses tramadol effects, thus pointing to the significant role of monoaminergic modulation and the synergy with opioid agonism in tramadol antinociception after a single oral dose.
-
Veterinary surgery : VS · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPostoperative analgesia for stifle surgery: a comparison of intra-articular bupivacaine, morphine, or saline.
A prospective study was undertaken to compare the analgesic effect of intra-articular bupivacaine, morphine, or saline in the 24-hour period following cranial cruciate ligament repair in dogs. Thirty-six clinical patients with ruptured cranial cruciate ligaments were randomly assigned to one of three groups. After surgical stabilization, and before skin closure, an intra-articular injection was given; group one (n = 12) received 0.5% bupivacaine HCl at 0.5 mL/kg, group two (n = 12) received morphine at 0.1 mg/kg diluted with saline to a volume of 0.5 mL/kg, and group three (n = 12) received saline at 0.5 mL/kg. ⋯ Dogs in the morphine and bupivacaine groups required less supplemental analgesia than dogs in the saline group. The local provision of analgesia reduces the need for systemic drugs with potential side effects. Both intra-articular morphine and intra-articular bupivacaine provided better postoperative analgesia than intra-articular saline, with intra-articular bupivacaine showing the greatest effect.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Patient-controlled analgesia with clonidine and piritramide].
Following parenteral administration, clonidine has analgesic effects at both cerebral and spinal levels. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) makes it possible to determine equipotent dosages of analgesics by relating analgesic consumption per time to the levels of analgesia obtained in comparable patient populations. Therefore, we studied the equipotency ratios of clonidine and piritramide and the incidence of undesired side effects in the treatment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing maxillo-facial surgery. ⋯ Intravenous clonidine is a potent analgesic and is suitable or the treatment of postoperative pain following maxillo-facial surgery. The analgesic potency of 150 micrograms clonidine i.v. was equivalent to that of 9.56 mg piritramide i.v. Nausea and vomiting occurred more rarely in the clonidine group, while deeper sedation was observed more frequently than in the piritramide group. Owing to the wide interindividual variation of analgesic consumption, clonidine dosages have to be adjusted to the actual requirements.