Articles: analgesia.
-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Apr 1995
Historical Article[Obstetric anesthesia-analgesia in Spain. A review of its historic evolution during the second half of the past century].
To examine the historical development of obstetric anesthesia in Spain during the second half of the nineteenth century. Research was based on in-depth analysis of accounts of anesthesia during the period covered, mainly from original sources, using established methods for studying the history of medicine. ⋯ We emphasize that controversy limited to a large extent the use of anesthesia in obstetrics. The controversy seems to have been fed by physicians' uneasiness with anesthesia as well as by certain prejudices of a religious or moral nature that are deeply rooted in Spanish society.
-
A 30-year-old woman was admitted to the labour ward at term complaining of symptoms suggestive of raised intracranial pressure which were overlooked. Epidural analgesia was administered following induction of labour and was associated with a clear exacerbation of symptoms. After delivery a CT scan revealed a large cerebello-pontine angle tumour with obstructive hydrocephalus. This case report and literature review demonstrate the importance of a reasonable level of clinical suspicion and a careful neurological examination in patients with such symptomatology to allow sensible and safe guidance through labour.
-
Recent research has demonstrated the increasing importance of the spinal cord in processing and modulating nociceptive input. Different groups of drugs, each acting by a unique mechanism, have been shown to block nociceptive afferent transmission. None of the currently available spinally administered local anesthetics, opioids or non-opioids produce analgesia without side effects. ⋯ Preliminary results suggest that the neuropeptide octreotide has potent analgesic effects. 'Balanced spinal analgesia' using a combination of low doses of drugs, with separate but synergistic mechanisms of analgesia, may produce the best results. The optimal drug combinations and dosages remain to be determined. It is essential that animal neurotoxicity studies followed by controlled clinical trials are performed before widespread spinal administration of new drugs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Thoracic epidural clonidine and morphine for postoperative pain relief.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the potentiation of the postoperative analgesic effect of thoracic epidural morphine by coadministration of thoracic epidural clonidine in a randomized double-blinded design. Twenty patients underwent radical gastrectomy under combined general anaesthesia (enflurane and nitrous oxide/oxygen) and epidural anaesthesia with local anaesthetics. They received a thoracic epidural bolus injection of either 0.05 mg.kg-1 morphine plus 3 micrograms.kg-1 clonidine (M+C group; n = 10) or 0.05 mg.kg-1 morphine alone (M group; n = 10) immediately before completion of surgery. ⋯ The cumulative number of iv morphine injections via PCA was less in the M+C group than in the M group at each hour for 24 hr postoperative period (P < 0.05), while the numbers of PCA morphine injections per hour beyond nine hours after surgery were higher in the M group than in the M+C group (P < 0.05). Sedation score was higher, and VAS and mean blood pressure were lower in the M+C group only at one hour after surgery compared with the M group. We conclude that the combined single thoracic epidural administration of morphine plus clonidine produces a more potent and longer lasting analgesia than does morphine alone.
-
This paper describes the responses of peripheral and central visceral nociceptive systems to acute injury and discusses these observations in relation to the concept of 'pre-emptive analgesia'. Visceral nociceptors are known to respond to injury but are also known to become sensitized to non-noxious stimuli during the inflammatory process that follows intense noxious stimulation. ⋯ Therefore it is proposed that the concept of 'pre-emptive analgesia', as such, has no neurophysiological basis. Any analgesic procedure aimed at reducing postoperative pain must not only prevent the arrival in the CNS of the initial afferent barrage evoked in nociceptive endings but also reduce or eliminate the persistent discharges of sensitized nociceptors during the inflammatory repair process that are critically important for the maintenance of the central pain state.