Articles: analgesia.
-
Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. · Mar 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialMaternal opinion about analgesia in labour and delivery. A comparison of epidural blockade and intramuscular pethidine.
In a prospective randomized study we evaluated the opinion of 97 parturients on either epidural analgesia or parenteral pethidine with respect to analgesic efficacy, general feelings and symptoms during labour and delivery. The analgesic effect of the epidural block was significantly superior to pethidine with regard to the pain score (visual analogue scale (VAS)0 during the first stage of labour (mean VAS 11 contrasting 65). ⋯ Fewer side effects were registered in the epidural group compared to the pethidine group, however only significantly concerning sleepiness. It is concluded that in this study low-dose epidural analgesia during the first stage of labour was superior to parenteral pethidine regarding pain relief and side effects.
-
We reported the requirement of supplemental analgesics following epidural opioids including Opial 5mg and 10mg, and morphine HCl 2.5mg, for 24 hours in postoperative period after surgery of body surface, and lower and upper abdominal surgeries. Incidence of their side effects was also observed. Opial contains 50% morphine HCl and other opioids such as codeine, thebaine, papaverine, and noscapine etc. ⋯ Kinds and doses of opioids used, suggest that epidural administration of other opioids contained in Opial has some analgesic effect. After the surgery of body surface the opioid requirement may be influenced by the intraoperative anesthetic technics and the state of mind of the patient. Urinary retention was the most interesting side effect observed and our data suggest that papaverine contained in Opial may have favorable effect and morphine HCl may have adverse effects regarding its incidence.
-
Regional-Anaesthesie · Mar 1990
Case Reports[Complications of the postoperative use of lumbar epidural catheters in place for surgery].
Two cases of secondary subarachnoidal dislocation of lumbar epidural catheters are reported. The first catheter was placed, tested, and injected with 20 ml local anesthetic in order to achieve intraoperative anesthesia up to the T4 level. ⋯ Use of this catheter for postoperative analgesia led to total spinal anesthesia in spite of negative aspiration and test dose prior to injection of 7 ml local anesthetic. Implications of these two cases concerning placement procedures and monitoring during reuse of catheters placed some time before are discussed.