Articles: sulfamethoxazole-drug-combination-trimethoprim.
-
Online J Curr Clin Trials · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialTrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with ciprofloxacin for the prevention of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Prophylaxis with low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been shown to be cost-effective in the prevention of urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis, urosepsis, and pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. Ciprofloxacin, effective against almost all urinary tract pathogens in this patient population, represents a promising alternative prophylactic agent for patients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole due to toxicity. ⋯ Ciprofloxacin is at least as effective as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prevention of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients, and is better tolerated. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is associated with a higher incidence of pneumocystis pneumonia than is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy. An uncontrolled follow-up study suggests that ciprofloxacin prophylaxis combined with monthly aerosolized pentamidine may be efficacious in preventing both urinary tract infection and pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplant recipients.
-
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. · Mar 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialOnce daily cefixime compared with twice daily trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infection in infants and children.
We conducted a randomized prospective multicenter study to compare the safety and efficacy of once daily oral cefixime (8 mg/kg) to twice daily oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) (8/40 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of acute urinary tract infection in children ages 6 months to 13 years. Seventy-six patients (38 in each group) were studied. Thirty-seven percent were younger than 3 years of age. ⋯ No failures were observed and relapse occurred in 3 cases within the 4 weeks after treatment (2 in the cefixime group and one in the TMP/SMX group). Side effects were observed in 14% of the cefixime group and 16% of the TMP/SMX group and were all mild enough not to necessitate discontinuation of therapy. We conclude that the efficacy and safety of cefixime administered once daily compared favorably with TMP/SMX administered twice daily for acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Norfloxacin compared to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of travelers' diarrhea among U.S. military personnel deployed to South America and West Africa.
A randomized treatment trial of travelers' diarrhea was carried out among U. S. military personnel participating in routine exercises in several port cities in South America and West Africa. A 5-day, twice daily course of either norfloxacin (400 mg) or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX, 160/800 mg) was given to 142 volunteers. ⋯ Resistance to TMP/SMX was present in 20 (27%) bacterial isolates, while no resistance to norfloxacin was found. Eight of 10 patients in the TMP/SMX treatment group who had TMP/SMX-resistant bacterial enteropathogens improved clinically. Both norfloxacin and TMP/SMX were clinically effective in the treatment of travelers' diarrhea in this military population.
-
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · Jan 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialMulticenter prospective randomized trial comparing ceftazidime plus co-trimoxazole with chloramphenicol plus doxycycline and co-trimoxazole for treatment of severe melioidosis.
A prospective randomized trial was conducted at Srinagarind and Khon Kaen hospitals. Ceftazidime (100 mg/kg of body weight per day) and co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim, 8 mg/kg/day; sulfamethoxazole, 40 mg/kg/day) therapy was compared with conventional therapy (chloramphenicol, 100 mg/kg/day; doxycycline, 4 mg/kg/day; trimethoprim, 8 mg/kg/day; sulfamethoxazole, 40 mg/kg/day) in the treatment of 64 patients with bacteriologically confirmed cases of severe melioidosis who were admitted during September 1986 to January 1989. Of 61 evaluable patients (3 were excluded because of severe drug allergies), 42 were septicemic, and 31 of these patients had the most severe form, disseminated septicemic melioidosis. ⋯ Among patients with disseminated septicemia and initial shock, there was no significant difference in mortality between the regimens. Both regimens effectively eradicated bacteria from the circulation within 24 h (97 versus 96%, respectively). We recommend ceftazidime and co-trimoxazole as the drugs of choice for treatment of severe melioidosis, especially in those patients with disseminated septicemia.