Articles: emergency-department.
-
ABSTRACTObjective:To assess the prevalence of an unfavourable outcome among children leaving without being seen by a physician in the emergency department (ED). Method:This was a prospective cohort study conducted over a complete year in a pediatric tertiary care ED. A random sample of all children younger than 19 years of age who left without being seen by a physician was contacted by phone 4 to 6 days following the ED visit. ⋯ Thirty-eight (2.4%; 95% CI 1.7-3.2) patients fulfilled the criteria for an unfavourable outcome. On multiple logistic regression, chief complaints related to trauma and absence of nurse counseling had higher risks of unfavourable outcome. Conclusions:Approximately 2% of children who left without being seen by a physician at a tertiary care pediatric ED had an unfavourable outcome.
-
ABSTRACTBackground:Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with adverse health outcomes. Possible explanations include differences in health status, access to health care, and care provided by clinicians. We sought to determine whether SES is associated with computed tomography (CT) use in the emergency department (ED). ⋯ For patients presenting with complex abdominal pain, no significant difference in CT use was observed. Conclusion:Lowest SES ED patients were less likely to receive CT scans overall and in headache and abdominal pain subgroups. No difference was seen among complex abdominal pain patients, suggesting that as clinical indications for the test become more clearcut, use across SES quintiles differs less.
-
ABSTRACTBackground:The RAPID approach (Resuscitation, Analgesia and assessment, Patient needs, Interventions, Disposition) was developed as an approach to managing emergency department patients. It is a mental checklist to help trainees provide comprehensive care, addressing issues in priority. Its impact on trainee performance has not been assessed. ⋯ Conclusions:Students exposed to the RAPID approach at the start of their emergency medicine rotation performed better on the one component of the written examination for which it was designed to improve performance. Students found it to be a useful mental checklist for comprehensive care, possibly addressing the hidden curriculum. Emergency medicine educators should consider further study and careful implementation of the RAPID approach.
-
Ther Clin Risk Manag · Jan 2013
A 6-year experience of CPR outcomes in an emergency department in Thailand.
Sudden cardiac arrest is a common emergency condition found in the emergency department of the hospital. The survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients is 2.0%-10.0% and 7.4%-27.0% percent for in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. The factors for survival outcome are divided into three main groups: patient characteristics, pre-hospital factors, and resuscitated information. The objective of this study was to evaluate the related factors, outcome, and survival rate in patients with cardiac arrest who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at Ramathibodi Emergency Medicine Department. There are limited data for this issue in Thailand and other Asian countries. ⋯ Factors associated with sustained ROSC were functional status before cardiac arrest, location of cardiac arrest, duration of CPR, and cause of cardiac arrest. Survival rate was related to the cause of cardiac arrest.
-
ABSTRACTObjective:Emergency department (ED) patients with symptoms of cardiac ischemia often require a second cardiac troponin (cTn) measurement to rule out non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. We measured the total turnaround time and the component event times following the ordering of the second cTn level to ED discharge to identify root causes of delays. Methods:We reviewed a random sample of ED discharges following a second normal cTn measurement and recorded associated event times. ⋯ Results:From 9,656 eligible cases, we randomly selected 226 for data collection. The median number of minutes for each event are as follows: from ordering the second cTn measurement to the time of ED discharge was 90 minutes (IQR 65-120); for blood collection from the time the collection was ordered for was 0 minutes (IQR -12-0); from blood collection to the time the blood was transported to the laboratory was 9 minutes (IQR 2-19); laboratory process duration was 44 minutes (IQR 39-52); from when the results were available to the time the patient was discharged was 30 minutes (IQR 15-52). Conclusions:For ED patients discharged following two normal cTn levels, the laboratory processing time and time from the result being available to the time of ED discharge represent the longest modifiable time periods to reduce ED length of stay.