Articles: postoperative-pain.
-
We reported the requirement of supplemental analgesics following epidural opioids including Opial 5mg and 10mg, and morphine HCl 2.5mg, for 24 hours in postoperative period after surgery of body surface, and lower and upper abdominal surgeries. Incidence of their side effects was also observed. Opial contains 50% morphine HCl and other opioids such as codeine, thebaine, papaverine, and noscapine etc. ⋯ Kinds and doses of opioids used, suggest that epidural administration of other opioids contained in Opial has some analgesic effect. After the surgery of body surface the opioid requirement may be influenced by the intraoperative anesthetic technics and the state of mind of the patient. Urinary retention was the most interesting side effect observed and our data suggest that papaverine contained in Opial may have favorable effect and morphine HCl may have adverse effects regarding its incidence.
-
Anesteziol Reanimatol · Mar 1990
Clinical Trial[Synthetic analgesic moradol at various stages of surgical treatment of patients with cancer].
Moradol ("Galenika", Yugoslavia)/butorphanol tartrate ("Bristol--Mayers C.", USA)/, a synthetic analgesic representing a new generation of opiate receptors agonists-antagonists, devoid of any narcogenic potential has been used as the only analgesic at all stages of anesthesia during cancer surgery in 26 patients. For premedication moradol was used in a mean dose of 0.032 +/- 0.003 mg.kg-1 in combination with diazepam (0.153 +/- 0.005 mg.kg-1) and atropine (0.01 mg X X kg-1). ⋯ General anesthesia was maintained with moradol, diazepam, nitrous oxide and droperidol. The data presented in the paper demonstrate the advantages of moradol at all stages of intra- and postoperative analgesia, which ensures stable anesthetic background (according to hemodynamic parameters) and reduces considerably an overall postoperative analgesic dose.
-
Patient-controlled analgesia is an innovative method of pain control that is being used with increasing frequency in postoperative patients. Besides affording patients a sense of control over their pain, the method seems to offer superior pain relief with less sedation compared with traditional methods. Nurses report that valuable patient care time is saved when complicated negotiations among nurses, patients, and physicians regarding pain management are eliminated, and tasks such as signing out and preparing analgesic injections are no longer necessary. A review of the method is presented.