Articles: postoperative-pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Epidural sufentanil for post-operative pain relief: effects of adrenaline.
The analgesic, respiratory and haemodynamic effects of epidural sufentanil 75 micrograms (Group 1) or sufentanil 75 micrograms with adrenaline 75 micrograms (Group 2) were studied in 20 patients following abdominal surgery in a double-blind randomized trial. Pain relief, assessed on a linear analogue scale, sedation, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR) and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) were recorded before, and for 12 h after, injection. Good post-operative pain relief was obtained after 4 min in Group 1 and 6 min in Group 2. ⋯ The patients in Group 1 showed more marked sedation 1 h after injection. Changes of HR and MAP were similar in both treatment groups. Side-effects were observed more frequently in Group 2, although the differences were not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesic effect of aspirin, mefenamic acid and their combination in post-operative oral surgery pain.
A double-blind randomized single dose study of the analgesic effects of 650 mg aspirin, 250 mg mefenamic acid, the combination of 650 mg aspirin and 250 mg mefenamic acid and placebo on 120 patients with pain following oral surgery was conducted. Patients evaluated their pain intensity and extent of pain relief at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after drug administration. For most parameters, including the sum of the pain intensity differences and the sum of the hourly pain relief scores, each of the drugs was more effective than placebo. Aspirin-mefenamic acid in combination was more effective than both drugs alone, and aspirin and mefenamic acid alone were equally effective for most of the analgesic variables.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intrathecal morphine in the management of pain following cardiac surgery. A comparison with morphine i.v.
Forty-four patients undergoing coronary revascularization received either intrathecal morphine 1 mg (n = 15), intrathecal morphine 2 mg (n = 15), or i.v. morphine 30 mg (n = 14) after the induction of anaesthesia. Morphine 2.5 mg i.v. was given, as required, in the postoperative period and pain score, respiratory rate and PaCO2 measured every 2 h. FVC, FEV1 and PEFR were measured before, and 24 h after, the induction of anaesthesia. ⋯ Postoperative PEFR was significantly better in patients given intrathecal morphine (P less than 0.01). These results suggest that intrathecal morphine provided better analgesia after cardiac surgery than did a conventional regimen. The lower dose (1 mg) was associated with less respiratory depression as assessed by PaCO2 measurements.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effect of the addition of adrenaline to extradural diamorphine analgesia after caesarean section.
In a randomized double-blind study the effect of the addition of adrenaline to extradural diamorphine was assessed in 54 patients after Caesarean section. Patients received extradural diamorphine 5 mg in saline 10 ml with or without adrenaline 1 in 200,000 for postoperative pain relief. Analgesia was profound and of rapid onset in both groups. ⋯ Analgesia was also more consistent in the adrenaline group, with 77% of patients having more than 8 h of good analgesia compared with 48% in the saline group (P less than 0.05). Plasma morphine concentrations, measured in 12 patients, were lower, although not significantly so, in the adrenaline group and mean time to peak concentration markedly delayed. No serious side effects were observed, but there was a higher incidence of vomiting in the adrenaline group.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1988
A statistical model for pain in patient-controlled analgesia and conventional intramuscular opioid regimens.
A statistical model was developed: 1) to compare the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and traditional intramuscular (IM) opioids for pain relief in 40 patients after total knee replacement and, 2) to evaluate pain cycles associated with each technique. Hourly visual analog pain scores were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and time-series analysis. Hourly verbal analog pain scores were used to determine predominant pain levels. ⋯ Hence, they self-administer opioids for pain relief with PCA according to their expectations. Population characteristics may modify PCA efficacy. These characteristics should be delineated and the use of PCA targeted to appropriate patients.