Articles: postoperative-pain.
-
Acta neurochirurgica · Jan 1990
Spinal cord stimulation in 112 patients with epi-/intradural fibrosis following operation for lumbar disc herniation.
A total of 112 patients with epi-/intradural fibrosis following operation for lumbar disc herniation were treated by spinal cord stimulation. Lumbosacral spinal fibrosis is seen particularly often after extensive and repeated operations. Radicular pain responds better to stimulation than back pain. ⋯ Among about 5,000 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation, an indication for spinal cord stimulation was found in 1.5%. By comparison, the frequency of the "last resort" procedure of microsurgical cordotomy was 0.3%. We no longer use other ablative methods like extirpation of spinal ganglia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Bupivacaine use after knee arthroscopy: pharmacokinetics and pain control study.
Bupivacaine (Marcaine) pharmacokinetics were determined in 11 patients receiving the drug intraarticularly after arthroscopic procedures performed on the knee with patients under general anesthesia. Forty milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine (100 mg) were given as a bolus into the intraarticular space of the knee of each patient. The thigh tourniquet was released 2-3 min after injection and blood samples were obtained 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 250, and 300 min after tourniquet release. ⋯ Peak levels can be minimized with shorter tourniquet inflation times and with longer injection to tourniquet release intervals. Ninety healthy adult outpatient knee arthroscopy patients also were studied to evaluate the effectiveness of bupivacaine in relieving postoperative knee discomfort when injected immediately postoperatively. The subjects were randomized into four groups: (a) intraarticular injection of saline, (b) intraarticular injection of bupivacaine, (c) subcutaneous injection of bupivacaine at the portal sites, and (d) both intraarticular and subcutaneous injection of bupivacaine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Analgesic efficacy and safety of single-dose oral and intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine for postoperative pain.
The efficacy and safety of the analgesic drug ketorolac tromethamine in the treatment of moderate to very severe postoperative pain was assessed in five dose-ranging studies with single-dose, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group designs. The drug was administered orally (2.5-200 mg, 352 patients in three trials) and intramuscularly (5-90 mg, 395 patients in two trials), and compared with placebo and reference drugs. Patients subjectively evaluated pain intensity and relief using verbal categoric and visual analog scales; efficacy values included pain intensity difference (PID), summed PID, and total pain relief. ⋯ Intramuscular ketorolac 10 and 30 mg were superior to intramuscular meperidine 50 and 100 mg. Ketorolac was well tolerated, with rates of adverse events generally lower than those of the opiate comparators. Ketorolac doses of 2.5 and 5 mg were less effective than higher doses; 10 mg or more resulted in faster onset of action and greater peak efficacy; 90 mg or more gave more prolonged analgesic effects.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of repeat doses of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and morphine sulfate for analgesia after major surgery.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel study in 542 patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of intramuscular ketorolac 30 mg (324 patients), morphine 6 mg (110 patients), and morphine 12 mg (108 patients) administered as needed as often as every 2 hours for a maximum of 20 doses or 5 days. The efficacy of ketorolac 30 mg was comparable to that of morphine 12 mg on every efficacy measure (average pain intensity, average pain relief, mean overall medication rating, and percentage of patients withdrawing because of inadequate relief). Ketorolac was statistically superior to morphine 6 mg for average pain intensity and mean overall rating. Ketorolac-treated patients had fewer adverse events than those who received either morphine dose.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Evaluation of ketorolac, aspirin, and an acetaminophen-codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain.
One-hundred twenty-eight outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive oral doses of ketorolac tromethamine 10 mg, aspirin 650 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg plus codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medicating. All active medications were significantly superior to placebo. ⋯ Repeat-dose data also suggested that ketorolac 10 mg was superior to aspirin 650 mg and acetaminophen-codeine on the day of surgery. Differences among the active medications were trivial for the postoperative days 1-6 analyses. The frequency of adverse effects was over 4 times greater for acetaminophen-codeine than for ketorolac or aspirin.