Articles: postoperative-pain.
-
Acta Chir Scand Suppl · Jan 1989
ReviewThe influence of anesthesia and postoperative analgesic management of lung function.
General anesthesia itself may influence postoperative lung function. It leads to a depression of the functional residual capacity, which, in combination with surgical trauma and postoperative pain, can provoke insufficient breathing, retention of bronchial secretions, and atelectasis. ⋯ After upper abdominal or thoracic surgery, postoperative epidural analgesia causes a significant increase of lung function as compared with systemic analgesia. The combination of regional anesthesia and general anesthesia intraoperatively appears to reduce lung function much less than general anesthesia alone.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialFailure of proglumide, a cholecystokinin antagonist, to potentiate clinical morphine analgesia. A randomized double-blind postoperative study using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
The potential clinical utility of drug interactions between morphine and the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide was examined in 80 postoperative patients suffering from moderate to severe pain. Four groups of ASA I-III patients (mean age 51 years, mean weight 72 kg) recovering from major abdominal or gynecological surgery (mean duration of surgery 141 minutes) performed under balanced anesthesia (midazolam, droperidol, fentanyl, N2O, enflurane) were randomly assigned to self-administer morphine-proglumide mixtures on the first postoperative day (ODAC; morphine demand dose 3 mg; infusion rate 0.36 mg/hr; lockout time 2 minutes; hourly maximum dose 15 mg/hr; proglumide doses per demand 0, 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, or 50 mg). ⋯ There were no statistically significant differences between the groups either for drug consumption, pain scores, or side effects. It is therefore concluded that proglumide does not potentiate morphine analgesia in a clinical (postoperative) setting.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparison of nalbuphine and pentazocine in the treatment of postoperative pain by self-administration].
The side-effects of two opioid agonist-antagonists, nalbuphine and pentazocine, were assessed when used for patient-controlled postoperative analgesia. Forty ASA I or II patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to two equal groups. The anaesthetic technique was the same for all the patients: premedication with atropine and diazepam, induction with thiopentone and suxamethonium and maintenance with fentanyl, pancuronium, nitrous oxide and halothane. ⋯ The only parameters significantly different between the two groups were Pasys and PRP, being higher in the pentazocine group. There were no significant differences in the side-effects (drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, headache, amnesia, logorrhoea and urine retention). All patients in both groups were satisfied with this technique.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Minerva anestesiologica · Jan 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Continuous intravenous infusion with patient-controlled anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section: morphine versus buprenorphine].
A double blind comparison between morphine and buprenorphine was performed in 20 patients using a new demand and continuous infusion analgesic system to provide analgesia after cesarean section. The patients were randomized in two equal groups to receive either morphine 1 mg/h or buprenorphine 0.03 mg/h. The PCA system was set to deliver bolus of either morphine 1 mg or buprenorphine 0.03 mg, with a lockout interval of 10 and 15 min respectively. ⋯ No difference in side effects between the groups was observed. The mean potency ratio between buprenorphine and morphine was 32:1. Patients receiving buprenorphine showed a more prolonged analgesia and a significant improvement of sedation score.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg · Jan 1989
Comparative StudyComparison of intramuscular nalbuphine and nicomorphine in the treatment of post-operative pain.
Nalbuphine and nicomorphine were administered intramusculary in single doses for the relief of moderate to severe pain after abdominal surgery in a group of 40 patients to compare the analgesic effect and clinical tolerance during a 2 hour period. There was no statistically significant difference of the analgesic effect. In both groups SBP, DBP and RR decreased and HR increased significantly after injection but the tolerance of nalbuphine seems to be beter. Nalbuphine is a good choice for postoperative pain.