Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Arthritis and rheumatism · Apr 2007
Randomized Controlled TrialA brief pain management program compared with physical therapy for low back pain: results from an economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.
Guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care recommend early intervention to address psychosocial risk factors associated with long-term disability. We assessed the cost utility and cost effectiveness of a brief pain management program (BPM) targeting psychosocial factors compared with physical therapy (PT) for primary care patients with low back pain of <12 weeks' duration. ⋯ PT is a cost-effective primary care management strategy for low back pain. However, the absence of a clinically superior treatment program raises the possibility that BPM could provide an additional primary care approach, administered in fewer sessions, allowing patient and doctor preferences to be considered.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical capacity tasks in chronic low back pain: what is the contributing role of cardiovascular capacity, pain and psychological factors?
To explore the association of personal and body functions with physical capacity tasks used in the evaluation of chronic low back pain (CLBP) treatment. ⋯ Cardiovascular capacity, pain intensity, fear of injury/movement, cognitions, and depression had statistically significant but clinically minor effects on several, but not all capacity tasks. Radiating pain, age and duration of complaints had no significant influence at all. Due to anthropometric differences men outperformed women on most tasks. Apparently the influence of many personal, physical but especially psychological factors on the selected capacity tasks is not high at all. This might indicate that these tasks are more objectively measuring physical capacity than expected.
-
Objective. Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) parameter settings have been well studied; however, the goal of this exploratory study was to examine the SCS parameters used during intra-operative stimulation (IOS) at trial lead placement. Methods. In this retrospective study, we report the IOS parameter settings for 22 patients who underwent thoracic SCS lead trial for treatment of refractory low back and/or leg pain. Results. Paresthesia coverage was shown to differ depending upon the pain syndrome and the region involved (back and/or leg, p = 0.03). ⋯ Important variations in field configuration practice patterns also emerged. Conclusions. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm and extend the current results. The ultimate goal for this report is to establish a foundation for future studies to create an evidence-based standardized algorithm for IOS to enhance the success rate of SCS trial screening.
-
Arthritis and rheumatism · Apr 2007
Risk factors for more severe regional musculoskeletal symptoms: a two-year prospective study of a general working population.
To quantify the relative contribution of work-related physical and psychosocial factors, individual factors, and health-related factors to the development of more severe musculoskeletal pain in the neck and upper limbs and the back and lower limbs. ⋯ Very few workers are totally free of pain in musculoskeletal regions, and we question the concept of incidence of musculoskeletal pain. The transition from no or minor pain to more severe pain was influenced by physical and psychosocial work place factors together with individual and health-related factors.
-
Due to the lack of international consensus regarding the efficiency of various methods for prevention of low back pain (LBP), this article describes the Israeli guidelines for prevention of L.B.P., based on the recommendations of the European Commission, COST Action B13. ⋯ The recommendations of the European committee, COST B13, served as the main source of information. The European group based its conclusions on systematic reviews mainly from the Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases, and other smaller databases for more specific topics. The search covered the years 1966-2003. Information was also gathered through personal contacts with experts in the field. Additional searches were conducted for recent RCT's, published following the most recent systematic reviews. The final recommendations were sent to be reviewed by international experts in LBP. Summary of recommendations for the general population: Physical exercise is recommended for prevention of sick leave due to LBP and for the occurrence or duration of further episodes (Level A). There is insufficient consistent evidence to recommend for or against any specific type or intensity of exercise (Level C). Information and education on back problems, if based on bio-psychosocial principles, should be considered (Level C), but information and education focused principally on a biomedical or biomechanical model cannot be recommended (Level C). Back schools based on traditional biomedical/biomechanical information, advice and instruction are not recommended for prevention in LBP (Level A). High intensity programs, which comprise both an educational/skills program and exercises, can be recommended for patients with recurrent and persistent back pain (Level B). Lumbar supports or back belts are not recommended (Level A). There is no robust evidence for or against recommending any specific chair or mattress for prevention in LBP (Level C), though persisting symptoms may be reduced with a medium-firm rather than a hard mattress (Level C). There is no evidence to support recommending manipulative treatment for prevention in LBP (Level D). Shoe insoles are not recommended for the prevention of back problems (Level A). There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against correction of leg length (Level D). Despite the intuitive appeal of the idea, there is no evidence, at this time, that attempts to prevent LBP in schoolchildren will have any impact on LBP in adults (Level D).