Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Perioperative ischaemia in aortic surgery: combined epidural/general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia vs general anaesthesia and i.v. analgesia.
The goal of this randomized study was to determine whether combined general and epidural anaesthesia with postoperative epidural analgesia, compared with general anaesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia, reduced the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing elective aortic surgery. ⋯ Combined general and epidural anaesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia do not reduce the incidence of myocardial ischaemia or morbidity compared with general anaesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The reinforced laryngeal mask airway for dento-alveolar surgery.
We have evaluated the reinforced laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for use during dento-alveolar surgery in 100 ASA I and II day-case patients allocated randomly to receive either a nasotracheal tube or reinforced LMA. We recorded ease of airway insertion, airway complications, quality of recovery and replies to a 24-h postoperative questionnaire. In addition, a fibreoptic assessment was made of laryngotracheal soiling, and the effect of head movement and the position of the reinforced LMA. ⋯ There were no differences in postoperative complications. No surgeon reported poor access to the operating field. Overall the reinforced LMA provided satisfactory conditions for this surgery but vigilance of the airway was required, especially at the time of extraction.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Cost aspects in anesthesia. Propofol versus isoflurane anesthesia].
Cost control is no longer an option, but a necessity. Propofol anaesthesia is expensive, however, the true differences in comparison to volatile anaesthetics (isoflurane) are not known. ⋯ A climate of cost-consciousness and cost-containment prevails at the present time. The costs of propofol and 'standard' isoflurane anaesthesia were without differences; however, isoflurane used in a low-flow system had the lowest cost in this study. Doubts are justified, however, as to whether the choice of anaesthetic agents may considerably lower the costs of an anaesthesia department.
-
To demonstrate the feasibility of transcranial high-frequency electrical stimulation with the patient under general anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. This method may be a useful tool for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways during cerebral and spinal operations. ⋯ Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation seems to be a new method for monitoring the motor tract. With this method, it is possible to monitor the motor function without interfering with the surgical team or with the surgical treatment of infratentorial and spinal lesions. Monitoring of relaxation is necessary to compare the amplitude of MEPs.