Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The effect of sufentanil in high doses on hemodynamics and electroencephalography activity in coronary patients].
Sufentanil, a synthetic opioid that is 5-10 times as potent as fentanyl, has been suggested by some authors to prevent hypertensive responses to noxious stimuli in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery much better than fentanyl, while in other studies it has failed to maintain cardiovascular stability during surgical stimulation. This study was designed to investigate the cardiovascular and electroencephalographic effects of high-dose sufentanil/O2/pancuronium anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS. ⋯ Cardiac and stroke volume indexes stayed significantly lower than the awake values, whereas heart rate remained essentially unchanged during the course of the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups during all measurements. In the EEG, sufentanil anesthesia was characterized by a decrease in the number of higher frequency waves and an increase in lower frequency (delta) waves, which did not change during sternotomy in 17 of the 20 patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEffects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on systemic hemodynamic function and systemic oxygen supply-demand relationship.
The effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) on total body oxygen supply-demand ratio are complex due to potential influences on both O2 delivery (QO2) and consumption (VO2). One hundred and five patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups to compare the cardiovascular and metabolic responses associated with (1) thoracic epidural anesthesia plus light general anesthesia (group TEA); (2) general anesthesia with halothane (group H); and (3) neuroleptanalgesia (group NLA). Values of cardiac index (CI) and QO2 were less intraoperatively in the TEA group than in the H or NLA groups, while VO2 values were similar. ⋯ Heart rate was slowest intraoperatively during TEA, and stroke work was less with TEA than with NLA. As cardiac filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance did not differ among the three groups, reduced adaptation of CI to tissue O2 needs during TEA was attributed to negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of the sympathetic blockade. We conclude that in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery, TEA has no apparent advantage over general anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Sufentanil-N2O2/O2 or halothane-N2O/O2 anesthesia in surgery of infants and children with congenital heart defects. Hemodynamics and plasma catecholamines].
Sufentanil-nitrous oxide/oxygen anesthesia was compared to halothane-nitrous oxide/oxygen anesthesia in 44 infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two techniques studied, with 22 patients in each group. The mean weight was 8.3 (4.4-15.8) kg in the sufentanil (S) group and 11.7 (5.2-18) kg in the halothane (H) group. ⋯ There were dose-dependent decreases in heart rate and small but significant decreases in mean and diastolic arterial pressure in the S group during deepening of anesthesia. There was a significantly greater decrease in systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures during the same period in the H group whereas the reduction in heart rate was minimal. In addition, in 5 of 22 patients receiving H there were episodes of nodal rhythms with dramatic decreases in systemic arterial pressure and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation in cyanotic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
[A comparison of the course of anesthesia using a bolus application of propofol, methohexital or etomidate as hypnotics and alfentanil analgesia].
The suitability of the analgesic-hypnotic combination alfentanil-propofol in nitrous oxide-oxygen IPPB for short-term and outpatient anesthesia was studied in 50 patients of ASA risk groups I and II. This study appeared pertinent since the two substances have the shortest half-lives of their respective classes of medication. For comparison, two groups of similar size were treated with the well-established combinations alfentanil-methohexital and alfentanil-etomidate. ⋯ These patients also showed the most rapid recovery; consequently, the combination of alfentanil and propofol would appear to be especially suitable for outpatients. For the induction of anesthesia alfentanil was administered in a dosage of 30 micrograms/kg body weight in combination with propofol 1.5 mg/kg, methohexital 1.0 mg/kg or etomidate 0.2 mg/kg. For anesthesia maintenance the following mean dosages were found to be suitable: Alfentanil 1 microgram/kg/min, propofol 46 micrograms/kg/min, methohexital 24 micrograms/kg/min, and etomidate 4 micrograms/kg/min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Neuroleptanesthesia versus thoracic epidural anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.
The hemodynamic consequences of abdominal aortic surgery with infrarenal cross-clamping were studied in 21 patients randomized in two groups. In Group I (11 patients), neuroleptanesthesia was utilized, while Group II (10 patients) received thoracic epidural anesthesia at the T8-9 level. ⋯ Nevertheless, in the two groups of patients, it is suggested that cardiac function was unfitted to the tissue oxygen demand after unclamping of the aortic prosthesis because the saturation in oxygen of the mixed venous blood and an increase in arteriovenous difference in oxygen were documented. These results point out that, whatever the anesthesia technique, the critical period in abdominal surgery could be aortic unclamping.