Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A randomized, double-blind pilot study examining the use of intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in female inpatients.
To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of intravenous (IV) ondansetron (two 8 mg doses 8 hours apart) and a placebo when used in the prevention of postoperative nausea and emesis (vomiting or retching). ⋯ Prophylactic IV ondansetron appears to be safe and causes a significant reduction in the frequency and severity of postoperative nausea and emesis.
-
British dental journal · Dec 1992
Multicenter StudyThe use of general anaesthesia for tooth extraction in children in London: a multi-centre study.
Following publication of the Poswillo report, the continued use of general anaesthesia in dentistry became the subject of a major debate. In particular, the provision of general anaesthetic services by general dental practitioners in order to carry out simple extractions for child patients has been called into question. Other authors have strongly supported the continued need for general anaesthesia and insist that for some patients it remains the technique of choice. ⋯ There was evidence of an increase in numbers at one centre when results were compared to those of a previous study and some evidence of a change in pattern of referral with time at the same centre, with an increase in the numbers of patients referred by general dental practitioners. Eighty-three per cent of the anaesthetics had been given for the extraction of carious primary teeth, with an average of 3.3 being extracted per child. Nearly one-third of the anaesthetics were for children under the age of 5 years.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialReversal of the central effects of midazolam by intravenous flumazenil after general anesthesia and use of a long-acting opioid in hospitalized patients: report of a multicenter double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Hospitalized Patients Study Group II.
A double-blind clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, in 146 hospitalized patients, who had had general anesthesia induced by midazolam and a long-acting opioid. Ninety-eight patients received flumazenil and 48 received placebo. Administered postoperatively at a mean intravenous dose of 0.84 mg (range: 0.2 mg to 1 mg), flumazenil reversed benzodiazepine-induced sedation to a greater extent than did placebo. ⋯ Flumazenil, compared with placebo, was not associated with an increased frequency of operative-site pain, and no serious adverse effects of this benzodiazepine antagonist were reported. The most frequent adverse experiences in both treatment groups were nausea, shivering, and operative-site pain. Vomiting, dizziness, and injection-site reactions were also reported in > or = 5% of patients treated with flumazenil.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialEffect of intravenous flumazenil on reversal of the central effects of midazolam used with short-acting opioids for general anesthesia in hospitalized patients: report of a multicenter, double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Hospitalized Patients Study Group I.
Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine central nervous system (CNS) depressant widely used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, is often supplemented with short-acting opioids for general anesthesia. Administered postoperatively, flumazenil, a specific benzodiazepine antagonist, reverses the CNS sedative effects of midazolam. In a double-blind clinical trial in hospitalized patients, flumazenil, administered postoperatively at an average intravenous dose of 0.89 mg (range: 0.4 mg to 1 mg), was more effective than placebo in reversing sedation and other residual effects of benzodiazepines in patients recovering from general anesthesia induced by midazolam (mean dose 29 mg) in conjunction with fentanyl (mean dose 0.4 mg) or sufentanil (mean dose 0.056 mg). ⋯ Measurements of psychomotor function and memory also showed significant between-group differences. Flumazenil, compared with placebo, was not associated with a substantially greater frequency of operative-site pain. These results demonstrate that the efficacy and safety of flumazenil were not compromised by the addition of a short-acting opioid to the anesthetic regimen.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialReversal of the central effects of midazolam by intravenous flumazenil after general anesthesia in outpatients: a multicenter double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Outpatients Study Group I.
In a US double-blind, multicenter study, flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, administered postoperatively in a mean intravenous dose of 0.67 mg (range, 0.2 to 1 mg), was superior to placebo in reversing sedation and other central nervous system effects of benzodiazepines in outpatients recovering from general anesthesia induced by midazolam, fentanyl or sufentanil, and nitrous oxide. Within 5 minutes after administration of flumazenil, sedation was reversed in 94% (87 of 93) of flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 13% (6 of 46) of placebo-treated patients. The criterion response (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score of 4 or 5) that was achieved at 5 minutes was maintained in 79 (93%) of 85 patients throughout the 180-minute observation period. ⋯ Patients given flumazenil did not experience more pain at the operative site or require more analgesic medication than did those given placebo. Nausea (flumazenil 24%; placebo 15%), dizziness (flumazenil 12%; placebo 2%), and vomiting (flumazenil 10%; placebo 9%) were the most frequent adverse effects in each group. In conclusion, flumazenil provided prompt arousal from benzodiazepine-induced sedation and was well tolerated.