Articles: propofol.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Dec 2024
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyComparing the haemodynamic effects of high- and low-dose opioid anaesthesia: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Post-induction hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg) occurs frequently and is usually caused by the cardiovascular adverse effects of the anaesthetic induction drugs used. We hypothesize that a clinically significant difference in the incidence and severity of hypotension will be found when different doses of propofol and remifentanil are used for induction of anaesthesia. ⋯ Induction of anaesthesia with different predicted equipotent combinations of propofol and remifentanil did result in statistically different but clinically irrelevant differences in haemodynamic endpoints during induction of anaesthesia. Our study could not identify preferable drug combinations that decrease the risk for hypotension after induction, although they all yield a similar predicted PTOL.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Impact of Propofol Administered before Extubation on Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Aims/Background Perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) are common in pediatric anesthesia, especially in otolaryngology procedures. In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated the impact of administering propofol before extubation on PRAEs in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Methods We enrolled children aged 3 to 8 years old, of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes I to III, scheduled for tonsillectomy, and randomly divided them into propofol and control groups. ⋯ Conclusion This trial demonstrated that while administering repeated small doses of propofol before extubation does not significantly reduce respiratory adverse events in children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, it does significantly reduce the incidence of severe coughing, improving postoperative recovery and clinical outcomes. Moreover, propofol helps reduce postoperative agitation, enhancing the safety and effectiveness of postoperative care, and maintaining its valuable clinical role in postoperative management. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05769842).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The potency-ratio of ciprofol and propofol under procedural sedation and anesthesia for outpatient hysteroscopy during cervical dilation: a study using up-and-down sequential allocation method.
Ciprofol(HSK3486) is a novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivate, a short-acting intravenous sedative, which has similar efficacy characteristics as propofol with less incidence of side effect. Both ciprofol and propofol are often used in outpatient hysteroscopic surgery for sedation. However, the relative potency of these two drugs has not been fully determined in this context. ⋯ The ED50 of ciprofol and propofol in preventing hysteroscopy dilatation reaction was 0.444 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.385-0.503 mg/kg) and 1.985 mg/kg (95% CI, 1.801-2.170 mg/kg) for outpatient hysteroscopy. The potency-ratio of ciprofol and propofol observed in our study was 1.0:4.5(95%CI,1:3.9-1:5.1).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
Studies have reported that ciprofol has the advantage of reducing injection pain compared to propofol during gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The effect of ciprofol on the injection pain in painless hysteroscopy needs to further explore. ⋯ NCT06413862.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial.
Ciprofol, a novel intravenous general anesthetic with a chemical structure similar to propofol, exhibits significantly enhanced potency. It offers a rapid onset, reduced incidence of injection pain, and has comparable effects on heart rate and blood pressure to propofol. However, clinical data on its use for anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery remain limited. ⋯ Ciprofol demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of injection pain compared to propofol, potentially improving patient comfort during anesthesia induction. Additionally, ciprofol showed comparable circulatory stability to propofol during anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery, suggesting it may be a suitable alternative to propofol for this application.