Articles: intubation.
-
Comparative Study
End-tidal CO2 measurement in the detection of esophageal intubation during cardiac arrest.
Measurement of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) has been used to detect accidental esophageal tube placement in noncardiac arrest situations. The purpose of our study was to determine whether ETCO2 measurement could distinguish tracheal from esophageal tube placement during closed-chest massage (CCM). Twelve large dogs were anesthetized, and endotracheal tubes were placed in both the trachea and the esophagus. ⋯ In group B, ETCO2 ranged from 2 to 11 mm Hg (median, 3 mm Hg). In this experimental model, measurement of ETCO2 reliably distinguished esophageal from tracheal intubation during cardiac arrest and CCM. If confirmed in human beings, this may prove to be a quick, reliable method of detecting esophageal intubation during cardiac arrest.
-
Fiberoptic endotracheal intubation with an endoscope (external diameter 4 mm) especially designed for anesthesiologists proved to be safe providing small-diameter tubes were used. The use of large-diameter tubes (I. ⋯ When this new tube was used there were no problems either in passing the bronchoscope through this "inner" tube or in withdrawing the inner tube after successful intubation. With the new device it was even possible to pass tubes with wider lumen into the trachea over the fiberscope with minimal difficulty and trauma.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
IV lignocaine fails to attenuate the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
I.v. lignocaine has been used with varying success to attenuate the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. We determined the optimal time of administration in 45 ASA I and II Chinese patients premedicated with morphine and hyoscine, and anaesthetized with thiopentone and suxamethonium. Patients were allocated randomly to a control group or three treatment groups to receive lignocaine 1.5 mg kg-1 i.v. 1, 2, or 3 min before laryngoscopy. Analysis of variance for measured and derived cardiovascular variables failed to show any significant difference between any of the groups.