Articles: postoperative.
-
Opioids are given for acute intra- and postope-rative pain relief or for chronic cancer pain. In the literature there are only rare and contradictory reports on the oral administration of opioids for chronic non-malignant pain. However, there is no reason to withhold strong analgesics for patients with severe pain. ⋯ Side effects are controlled by additional medication. The principle of opioid administration is prophylaxis of pain -therefore, they should be given "by the clock". Opioids are not only indicated in malignant illness, but also according to severity of pain and by the failure of other measures to control pain.
-
In this randomized study, the efficacy of i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was determined for the opioid piritramide (a pure mu-receptor agonist) and the antipyretic analgesic metamizole (Dipyrone) in three groups of patients following abdominal surgery. The doses of piritramide were 1.5 mg (40 patients) and 3 mg (40 patients) on demand. In addition, we studied the effect of 71 mg metamizole in combination with on-demand boluses of 1.5 mg piritramide in 40 patients. ⋯ The intensity of typical side effects of opioids and antipyretic analgesics (nausea, vomiting, lowering of respiratory frequency, sweating) was low and always easily controlled. The acceptance by patients, nurses, and physicians of PCA was high. PCA with on-demand intravenous injection of the combination of piritramide and metamizole improved the degree of analgesia and concomitantly reduced the opioid dose.
-
The aim of this study was to evaluate a new modified visual analog scale, called the dolorimeter, together with a verbal rating scale (VRS) and a linear visual scale (VAS), in the measurement of acute postoperative pain. The scales were evaluated with reference to their sensitivity, reliability and validity, and correlation. During the study 200 patients 11-70 years of age (125 men, 75 women) were interviewed after orthopedic surgery to ascertain the intensity of the pain. ⋯ On the other hand, the high sensitivity of the two analog scales which patients can use to determine their individual pain intensity proved to be much more sensitive. All three methods correlated statistically; the highest correlation coefficients were found between the analog scales VAS and the dolorimeter. Because the dolorimeter is clearly preferred to the other methods, especially by elderly patients, we came to the conclusion that the dolorimeter is less abstract than the VAS and more practical to handle.
-
There is no uniform etiology of cancer pain. It is essential to understand the pathogenesis of pain as far as possible before a therapeutic modality can be conceived. The anatomical relation of the painproducing lesion to the site of pain perception should be clear (local, projected and referred pain). ⋯ Due consideration is given to neuroleptics and antidepressive drugs. Information about hormones (corticosteroids, calcitonin a. o.) in cancer pain therapy conclude this survey. Enormous differences of morphine use (Austria: 0.66 kg vs Denmark 16.59 kg per million people per year) indicate that there is a great demand for further professional education in this field.
-
Patients operated because of lumbar disc herniations (104 patients) were included in a randomized double-blind study analyzing the influence of dexamethasone versus placebo on postoperative drug requirements and the pain score on the visual analogue scale. High doses of dexamethasone had been administered: 40 mg i.v. on the night before the operation; 8 mg intraoperatively topical perineural application; 8 mg i.v. in the evening of the day of operation; 2x8 mg i.m. on days 1 and 2 postoperatively; 2x4 mg i.m. on days 3 and 4; 4 mg po on day 5 and 6 postoperatively. A significant decrease in the requirement for analgesics was found in the drug-treated group, particularly male patients, and also an impressive reduction in the lumbar pain score. In conclusion, there was good alleviation of sciatic pain in the dexamethasone-treated group of females during the 1st week after operation, but we found no evidence that the agent tested had an influence on the clinical outcome 1 month following the operation.