Articles: aortic-rupture-etiology.
-
Expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms in relation to their size is a source of debate. We studied 114 patients (out of a cohort of 752 consecutive patients admitted with abdominal aortic aneurysms) who were denied any immediate operation because of patient's refusal, high surgical risk, or small transverse diameter as assessed by CT scanning and ultrasonography. All patients not operated on underwent from two to six repeated examinations during an average follow-up period of 26.8 months (range, 3 to 132). ⋯ The incidence of rupture was clearly related to the final diameter value, rising from 0% in aneurysms less than 40 mm to 22% in large size aneurysms (greater than or equal to 50 mm). Among the 49 patients not operated on, one died of rupture before operation and five of causes unrelated to the disease. Using individual serial measurements, we determined the linear expansion rate of the aneurysm, which proved to be related to initial diameter values: 5.3 mm/year for diameters less than 40 mm (n = 49), 6.9 mm/year in the 40 to 49 mm group (n = 41), and 7.4 mm/year for diameters of 50 mm or more (n = 24).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
It has been assumed by some authors that patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms may be at increased risk of rupture after unrelated operations. From July 1986 to December 1989, 33 patients (29 men, 4 women) with a known abdominal aortic aneurysm underwent 45 operations. Twenty-eight patients had an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, and five patients had a thoracoabdominal aneurysm. ⋯ Four patients are awaiting repair. During this same 40-month period, two other patients, not known to have an abdominal aortic aneurysm, died of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after another operative procedure, at 21 days and 77 days. All three ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were 5.0 cm or greater in transverse diameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 99 patients who suffered sternal fractures between 1968 and 1987. Patients ranged in age from 5 to 86 years. The most common cause of injury was a motor vehicle accident. ⋯ Traumatic aortic rupture occurred in 2 of 99 patients with sternal fractures (2%) and in 75 of 2,106 patients without sternal fracture (3.6%). This difference was not statistically significant by the Fisher exact test (p = 0.326). We conclude that traumatic aortic rupture does not occur more commonly in patients with sternal fracture when compared with other patients with blunt chest injuries.
-
Although individual reports have indicated that a fracture of the first or second rib is predictive of injury to the thoracic aorta and its major branches, the results of a careful review of the literature do not support this contention. In patients suffering blunt trauma, the risk of disruption of the aorta is not greater in patients with fracture of the upper two ribs, compared with victims of trauma with fracture of other ribs or those without fracture of ribs. Clinical manifestations are often absent in patients with disruption of the aorta or the innominate artery, but evidence of mediastinal hemorrhage is almost always present on roentgenograms of the chest. ⋯ Repeat examinations must be performed and serial roentgenograms of the chest must be obtained for several days after injury to assess the possibility of unrecognized vascular trauma. If clinical or roentgenographic evidence of vascular injury is revealed, arteriography is mandatory. Thoracic CT scanning in patients with evidence of mediastinal hemorrhage on plain film may be of value in selecting patients for angiography, but additional experience must be obtained before such a protocol becomes an established policy.
-
Penetrating ulcer of the thoracic aorta is defined as an atherosclerotic lesion of the descending thoracic aorta with ulceration that penetrates the internal elastic lamina, allowing hematoma formation in the media. There is controversy whether this lesion differs from classic acute type III aortic dissection, based on its location, radiographic findings, natural history, and recommended therapeutic approach. Of 47 patients with a diagnosis of aortic dissection seen at our hospital during a 2-year period, five patients had clinical and radiographic findings of penetrating ulcer. ⋯ All five patients were alive and free of symptoms at 6 months, 8 months, 14 months (two patients), and 30 months after the original diagnosis. Follow-up CT scans in four patients showed resolution of subintimal hematoma and some dilatation of the lumen but no progression to rupture or aneurysm. Other authors stress the importance of differentiating symptomatic penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers from acute type III aortic dissection because of the higher incidence of rupture of penetrating ulcers and therefore recommend early surgical intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)