Articles: outcome.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 2003
Comparison of continuous infusion versus midwife administered top-ups of epidural bupivacaine for labour analgesia: effect on second stage of labour and mode of delivery.
Using a population-based study we retrospectively compared the effect of continuous versus intermittent top-up epidural analgesia on the outcome of labour at the University Hospital of Wales. We analysed the labour outcome of 410 primigravid deliveries over an 18-month period during a change in delivery suite protocol. ⋯ There were no significant differences in terms of group characteristics, women undergoing assisted vaginal delivery (group 1: 83 vs. group 2: 70, OR 0.8 CI 0.5-1.2), caesarean section (group 1: 59 vs. group 2: 61, OR 1.0 CI 0.6-1.5), and women with prolonged second stage (group 1: 50 vs. group 2: 47, OR 1.1 CI 0.6-1.8). The presumed reduction in motor blockade associated with intermittent top-up epidural regimes did not affect the outcome of labour.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 2003
Comparison of general and epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section for placenta previa totalis: maternal hemodynamics, blood loss and neonatal outcome.
There are few consistent guidelines in choosing anesthesia for cesarean section for a parturient with placenta previa. This prospective randomized trial was organized to compare the maternal hemodynamics, blood loss and neonatal outcome of general versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section with the diagnosis of grade 4 placenta previa. After giving informed consent, 12 patients received general anesthesia and 13 received epidural. ⋯ The Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min were similar in the two groups (8 [4-9] vs. 8 [7-9] and 10 [6-10] vs. 9 [9-10], respectively). We concluded that epidural anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia in elective cesarean section for grade 4 placenta previa with regard to maternal hemodynamics and blood loss. There was no difference in neonatal outcome.
-
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis · Nov 2002
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial.
Endovascular detachable coil treatment is being increasingly used as an alternative to craniotomy and clipping for some ruptured intracranial aneurysms, although the relative benefits of these two approaches have yet to be established. We undertook a randomized, multicenter trial to compare the safety and efficacy of endovascular coiling with standard neurosurgical clipping for such aneurysms judged to be suitable for both treatments. We enrolled 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms and randomly assigned them to neurosurgical clipping (n = 1070) or endovascular treatment by detachable platinum coils (n = 1073). ⋯ The risk of rebleeding from the ruptured aneurysm after 1 year was two per 1276 and zero per 1081 patient-years for patients allocated endovascular and neurosurgical treatment, respectively. In patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, for which endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping are therapeutic options, the outcome in terms of survival free of disability at 1 year is significantly better with endovascular coiling. The data available to date suggest that the long-term risks of further bleeding from the treated aneurysm are low with either therapy, although somewhat more frequent with endovascular coiling.
-
Jornal de pediatria · Nov 2002
[Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal patients in septic shock].
The Institute of Medicine has called for the development of clinical guidelines and practice parameters to develop "best practice" and potentially improve patient outcome. ⋯ American College of Critical Care Medicine adult guide lines for hemodynamic support of septic shock have little application to the management of pediatric or neonatal septic shock. Studies are required to determine whether American College of Critical Care Medicine guidelines for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock will be implemented and associated with improved outcome.
-
This prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was designed to determine the clinical outcome of patients who underwent Intradiscal Electrotherapy (IDET) for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Twenty-seven consecutive patients undergoing IDET were prospectively evaluated. All patients, as determined by provocative discography and/or MRI, had discogenic disease with chronic low back pain and were non-responsive to conservative treatment for at least 6 months. ⋯ This did not translate into a significant improvement in the SF-36 survey scores. The risks are negligible, and recovery time is minimal. The procedure may be useful in selected patients who would otherwise undergo an interbody fusion procedure.