Articles: sensitivity-specificity.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Dec 2021
Review Meta AnalysisMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Appendicitis remains a difficult disease to diagnose, and imaging adjuncts are commonly employed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging test that can be used to diagnose appendicitis. It is not commonly regarded as a first-line imaging test for appendicitis, but the reported diagnostic accuracy in some studies is equivalent to computed tomography (CT) scans. As it does not expose patients to radiation, it is an attractive imaging modality, particularly in women and children. ⋯ MRI appears to be highly accurate in confirming and excluding acute appendicitis in adults, children, and pregnant women regardless of protocol. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low due to incomplete and low standards of follow-up, so summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity may be biased. We could not assess the impact and direction of potential bias given the very low number of high-quality studies. Studies comparing MRI protocols were few, and although we found no influence of MRI protocol variables on the summary estimates of accuracy, our results do not rule out that some MRI protocols are more accurate than others.
-
Meta Analysis
Diagnostic value of microRNA-148/152 family in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer with extremely high morbidity and mortality. ⋯ Current evidence indicated that miR-148/152 family might be served as novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for NSCLC diagnosis with good sensitivity and specificity. it still needs more research with high quality, large sample sizes, and multiple centers for further verification.
-
The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of an isoform of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by a meta-analysis. ⋯ AFP-L3% has high specificity but low sensitivity for diagnose early HCC, suggesting that AFP-L3% is more valuable for excluding HCC in conditions with elevated AFP than for diagnosing early HCC. In addition, a hypersensitive detection method can improve the diagnostic accuracy of AFP-L3% for early HCC.
-
Review Meta Analysis
MRI versus CT for the detection of pulmonary nodules: A meta-analysis.
Computed tomography (CT) is the current gold standard for the detection of pulmonary nodules but has high radiation burden. In contrast, many radiologists tried to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to replace CT because MRI has no radiation burden associated. Due to the lack of high-level evidence of comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus CT for detecting pulmonary nodules, it is unknown whether CT can be replaced successfully by MRI. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus CT for detecting pulmonary nodules. ⋯ Our study suggested both CT and MRI have a high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing pulmonary nodules, while CT was superior to MRI in sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and AUC, indicating that in terms of the currently available evidence, MRI could not replace CT in diagnosing pulmonary nodules.
-
Meta Analysis
Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.
SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) are increasingly being integrated in testing strategies around the world. Studies of the Ag-RDTs have shown variable performance. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the clinical accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of commercially available Ag-RDTs. ⋯ In this study we found that Ag-RDTs detect the vast majority of SARS-CoV-2-infected persons within the first week of symptom onset and those with high viral load. Thus, they can have high utility for diagnostic purposes in the early phase of disease, making them a valuable tool to fight the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Standardization in conduct and reporting of clinical accuracy studies would improve comparability and use of data.