Articles: colic.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Administration of rectal indomethacin does not reduce the requirement for intravenous narcotic analgesia in acute renal colic.
The aim of this study was to compare the total dose of intravenous pethidine required to give satisfactory analgesia to patients with acute renal colic between two groups, one of which was also administered rectal indomethacin on presentation and one which was not. This was a prospective, randomized, unblinded comparison study. Each group contained 39 patients. ⋯ The primary endpoint was total pethidine dose required to achieve analgesia to the patient's satisfaction. No significant difference in total pethidine dose between the groups was found. It was concluded that administration of rectal indomethacin does not reduce the total dose of intravenous pethidine required to relieve the pain of acute renal colic.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and pethidine in the alleviation of renal colic.
To compare the analgesic efficacy of a single 30 mg intramuscular dose of ketorolac with that of intramuscular pethidine 100 mg, in a double-blind, parallel-group investigation of patients presenting with pain suggestive of renal colic. ⋯ Ketorolac can be considered a viable alternative to pethidine for the treatment of renal colic.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Indomethacin suppositories versus intravenously titrated morphine for the treatment of ureteral colic.
To develop a protocol for the blinded IV titration of morphine and to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effect profile of indomethacin suppositories versus IV morphine in the treatment of acute ureteral colic. ⋯ IV morphine produced more rapid analgesia than rectally administered indomethacin. There were no significant differences in vital sign changes or number of side effects between the two treatment groups. This study is the first to compare an NSAID with morphine administered by IV titration, considered by many to be the "gold standard" for relief of acute, severe pain. Future studies could evaluate the simultaneous administration of an opioid combined with an NSAID or compare an IV titrated opioid with an IV NSAID.
-
World journal of urology · Jan 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialDouble-blind study with dipyrone versus tramadol and butylscopolamine in acute renal colic pain.
To investigate the combined analgesic and spasmolytic effect of dipyrone, 104 patients suffering from "severe" or "excruciating" colic pain due to a confirmed calculus in the upper urinary tract were randomized to receive i.v. either 2.5 g dipyrone (36 patients), 100 mg tramadol (35 patients), or 20 mg butylscopolamine (33 patients) in a multicentre, observer-blind, parallel-group study conducted in 8 German centres. The three treatment groups were homogeneous when analyzed by age, sex, height, and baseline pain intensity. ⋯ Only 5 patients receiving dipyrone needed "rescue" medication as compared with 13 patients given tramadol and 11 patients receiving butylscopolamine. Adverse events were observed in 4 patients receiving butylscopolamine and in 1 patient each given dipyrone and tramadol. "Distinct" pain relief as assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) is a reliable method of determining the onset of analgesic action in the colic pain model.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Nov 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialObserver-blind study with metamizole versus tramadol and butylscopolamine in acute biliary colic pain.
To investigate the combined analgesic and spasmolytic effect of metamizole (dipyrone, Novalgin, CAS 68-89-3) this drug was compared with an opioid analgesic (tramadol) and a pure spasmolytic drug (butylscopolamine). In a multicentre, observer-blind, parallel-group study conducted in five German centres 74 patients suffering from "severe" or "excruciating" colic pain caused by a calculus in the bile duct were randomized to receive intravenously 2.5 g metamizole (25 patients), 100 mg tramadol (25 patients), or 20 mg butylscopolamine (24 patients). The three treatment groups were homogeneous for age, sex, height, weight and baseline pain intensity. ⋯ Metamizole was also more effective for the secondary efficacy endpoint, pain intensity on a 5-point ordinal scale. In the patient's overall assessment of treatment efficacy at the end of the trial, metamizole was rated as the most effective drug (p < 0.005). Fewer patients in the metamizole (3) and the tramadol (1) groups than in the butylscopolamine group (8) needed a second injection of the "rescue" medication (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)