Articles: hook-plate.
-
Eur J Trauma Emerg S · Dec 2013
Evaluation of the use of the hook plate in Neer type 2 lateral clavicle fractures and Rockwood types 3-5 acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
For most types of acromioclavicular (AC) injuries, treatment is well established. For Neer type 2 lateral clavicle fractures and Rockwood types 3-5 AC dislocations, the ideal treatment is still a point of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome in patients treated for one of these two lesions in our hospital. ⋯ This study suggests that hook plate fixation is a reliable treatment for Neer type 2 lateral clavicle fractures and Rockwood types 3-5 AC injuries. It results in a good and comparable function of the shoulder when compared to the contralateral side, high union rate, good to excellent objective and subjective results, and allows early active motion with limited abduction. A disadvantage is the necessity to remove the plate.
-
Comparative Study
Biomechanical evaluation of 3 stabilization methods on acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
Traumatic acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations can be addressed with several surgical stabilization techniques. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate biomechanical features of the native joint compared with 3 different stabilization methods: locking hook plate (HP), TightRope (TR), and bone anchor system (AS). ⋯ The results show different biomechanical properties of the HP and anatomic reconstructions.
-
The small fragment AO clavicular hook plate is indicated for certain fractures of the lateral end of clavicle and for symptomatic acromio-clavicular joint dislocations where there is rupture of the stabilizing ligaments. The complex anatomy and biomechanics of the acromio-clavicular joint can lead to complications that result in damage to the joint itself or acromial erosion. In addition, the rotator cuff complex is at risk of injury when inserting the plate. We report three cases where patients who underwent hook plate fixation subsequently required removal of the implant due to complications previously unreported in current literature.