Articles: outcome-assessment-health-care.
-
Symptom management is increasingly recognized as a critical element of patient care, particularly in managing chronic illness. However, research on outcomes related to symptom management is in its infancy, except for the symptom of pain. This symptom was therefore chosen as a prototype to review the state of the science regarding relations between organizational variables and symptom management outcomes and to illustrate the issues regardless of the symptom managed. This article discusses pain outcome measures appropriate for acute and cancer pain, proposes attributes of the care delivery system that may affect outcome measures, and identifies challenges associated with this type of research. ⋯ Although the answer to this question is unknown, a few research studies suggest that organizational context is likely to influence pain outcomes. It is clear, however, from ongoing work that until several conceptual, methodological, and analytic challenges are resolved, research is unlikely to capture the influence of variations in care delivery systems on symptom management outcomes.
-
Nurs. Clin. North Am. · Sep 1997
ReviewThe role of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) in improving outcomes of care.
This article describes the various outcomes programs supported by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). The mission of the agency is to generate and disseminate information that improves the delivery and quality of health care. The agency is charged with helping consumers, providers, purchasers, health plans, and policy makers meet the challenge of improving the quality of health care services while reducing spending. AHCPR has been recognized as funding the development of "gold standard" clinical practice guidelines and the source of unbiased, science-based information on what works and does not work in health care.
-
J Public Health Med · Jun 1997
ReviewOutcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review.
Information generated using outcome measures to measure the effectiveness of palliative care interventions is potentially invaluable. Depending on the measurement tool employed the results can be used to monitor clinical care, carry out comparative research, provide audit data or inform purchasing decisions. However, the data collected can only ever be as good as the method used to obtain them. ⋯ The criteria for the inclusion and assessment of measures were a measure assessing more than one domain and a target population of advanced disease or palliative care Forty-one measures were identified, 12 of which satisfied the inclusion criteria. These contained between five and 56 items and covered aspects of physical, psychological and spiritual domains. Each measure meets some but not all of the objectives of measurement in palliative care, and fulfils some but not all of our criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and appropriateness.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Apr 1997
ReviewAnesthesia information-management systems: their role in risk-versus cost assessment and outcomes research.
Computerized clinical information systems clearly have a role in this era of managed care when outcomes research and cost/benefit analyses are becoming crucial. Despite anesthesiologists' leadership in developing physician-entry systems, automated recordkeeping systems have been underused. This report reviews the problems and possible solutions associated with establishing more effective and user-friendly systems in the anesthesia specialty. ⋯ To filter the vast amount of data collected by electronic medical-records systems in the ordinary course of care that are not applicable to a specific study, some form of filtering or data reduction on transfer to research or administrative databases will be needed. To allow careful analysis of possible correlations of outcome to care choices requires both the capture of the clinical context-a detailed description of all relevant conditions extending well beyond merely the objective vital signs-throughout a specific medical episode and the establishment of postoperative evaluation systems to allow outcomes capture. Connections to new as well as existing outcome data will provide vast new opportunities for outcomes research.
-
Review Comparative Study
[Investigation methods in clinical cardiology. VI. Evaluation of results (outcomes) and its clinical relevance in cardiology: with a special reference to the quality of life].
Over the last decade, changes in health care delivery and concern with costs and with dramatic variations in practice between regions, institutions and even physicians at the same institution have led the administrators and health politicians to focus on the outcomes of medical care. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research was established with the objective of fostering research on the outcomes of medical interventions and on the development of guidelines. The Agency supports studies based not only on standard outcomes such as mortality and morbidity, but also on quality of life and patient satisfaction. ⋯ Nevertheless, apparently valid studies of cardiovascular diseases and interventions using health related quality of life as an outcome measures have been reported where such measures have provided information about undesirable side effects of medications and the impact of the intervention on the health related quality of life. Moreover, some of these studies have identified different patterns of health care as leading to different quality of life outcomes. Thus, quality of life measurement appears as a technology which holds promise for the future assessment of clinical effectiveness.