Articles: outcome-assessment-health-care.
-
Meta Analysis
Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments?
The superiority of innovative over standard treatments is not known. To describe accurately the outcomes of innovations that are tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 3 factors have to be considered: publication rate, quality of trials, and the choice of the adequate comparator intervention. ⋯ The finding that the results in individual trials cannot be predicted in advance indicates that the system and rationale for RCTs is well preserved and that successful interventions can only be identified after an RCT is completed.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach.
Definitive and unequivocal evidence to support the practice of early or late surgery is still lacking in clinical studies. Accordingly, meta-analysis is one of the few methods that offer a rational, statistical approach to management decision. A review of the clinical literature on spinal cord injury with emphasis on the role of early surgical decompression and a meta-analysis of results was performed. ⋯ Although statistically the percentage of patients with incomplete neurological deficits improving after early decompression appear 89.7% (95% confidence interval: 83.9, 95.5%), to be better than with the other modes of treatment when taking into consideration the material available for analysis and the various other factors including clinical limitations; early surgical decompression can only be considered as practice option for all groups of patients.
-
Meta Analysis
Nontrauma helicopter emergency medical services transport: annotated review of selected outcomes-related literature.
While helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) has its roots in military transport of wounded soldiers, rotor-wing transport is also used for a wide variety of nontrauma indications. Despite this common use of HEMS for noninjured patients, a Medline search found little systematic review of the literature pertinent to HEMS use for nontrauma. ⋯ The paper's goal is to provide a useful resource for those interested in pursuing more focused review of various sectors of the nontrauma HEMS literature. As such, the main objective of the article summaries is to provide a brief outline of study design and results; there is also limited editorial comment included after each summary.
-
Meta Analysis
Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega-trials: is a single global assessment good enough?
We sought to investigate the potential of using a simple global estimation ('How effective do you think the treatment was?') as a measure of efficacy by comparing it with at least 50%maxTOTPAR (at least 50% of the maximum possible pain relief) in acute pain studies. One hundred and fifty randomized, double-blind trials included in 11 systematic reviews of single dose, oral analgesics for postoperative pain were used as a source of data. The relationship between the proportion of patients reporting the top two or three values on a five-point global scale and the proportion with at least 50%maxTOTPAR was investigated. ⋯ Individual patient data were also used from four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials in postoperative pain. The frequency distribution for %maxTOTPAR was plotted for patients reporting each of the five categories on the global scale. A global assessment provides similar measures of analgesic efficacy as TOTPAR derived from hourly measurements, but the effects of adverse effects have yet to be understood.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
Review Meta AnalysisSelf-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma.
A key component of many asthma management guidelines is the recommendation for patient education and regular medical review. A number of controlled trials have been conducted to measure the effectiveness of asthma education programmes. These programmes improve patient knowledge, but their impact on health outcomes is less well established. This review was conducted to examine the strength of evidence supporting Step 6 of the Australian Asthma Management Plan: "Educate and Review Regularly"; to test whether health outcomes are influenced by education and self-management programmes. ⋯ Training in asthma self-management which involves self-monitoring by either peak expiratory flow or symptoms, coupled with regular medical review and a written action plan appears to improve health outcomes for adults with asthma. Training programmes which enable people to adjust their medication using a written action plan appear to be more effective than other forms of asthma self-management.