Articles: outcome-assessment-health-care.
-
Flora's Z statistic and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) as indicators of excess mortality were calculated for a sample of 355 patients with major trauma. A statistically significant overall excess mortality was observed in this sample (Z = 6.77, SMR = 1.81, p less than 0.05). ⋯ Total prehospital time over 60 minutes was associated with a significant increase in excess mortality (p less than 0.001). These results support regionalization of trauma care and failed to show any benefit associated with MD-ALS.
-
To identify patient variables that were significantly associated with outcome in the ICU. ⋯ For patients who remain in the ICU for greater than 72 hrs, events occurring after ICU admission are negatively associated with ICU outcome, more so than ICU admission status as reflected by such indices as APACHE II scores. Iatrogenic complications, often due to inappropriate drug therapy, have a significant association with adverse outcome by multivariate analysis. We suggest that iatrogenic complications influence ICU outcome, and that they are potentially preventable. By lessening their frequency, ICU outcome may be improved.
-
The federal Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 specifies that a state may establish a program to reward--through public recognition, incentive payments, or both--nursing facilities that provide the highest quality care to residents entitled to Medicaid. As state policymakers, providers, and advocates consider development of systems for rewarding quality in nursing homes, including incentive payments based on resident outcomes, theoretical and practical dilemmas must be addressed. The article examines the impetus for combining incentives with outcome measures and the conceptual dilemmas that outcome-based payments pose. Issues basic to successful implementation of incentive payments to nursing homes based on quality of care outcomes are also delineated.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: I. Description of methods and populations.
The objectives of this study were first to develop and institute a methodology for the study of anaesthetic outcome for parallel use in four teaching hospitals in Canada and second, to compare rates of morbidity and mortality associated with anaesthesia between the four centres. The basic design of the study was occurrence screening with anaesthetists entering data on patient demographics, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Research nurses reviewed anaesthetic records and hospital charts and interviewed patients postoperatively. ⋯ There were major differences found across the hospitals, particularly with regard to volume, patient case-mix, anaesthetic drugs and monitoring used. The use of parallel training, repeated consultations and use of rounds and inservices contributed to the reliability and validity of the data collection. We conclude that outcome surveillance can be instituted in different hospital Departments of Anaesthesia with sufficient confidence to form the basis of comparison of anaesthetic outcome.