Articles: acetaminophen.
-
Multicenter Study
Semiological evaluation of pain according to its origin: a prospective, observational, and national study of current French medical practice.
To determine how the origin of acute pain influences its semiological characteristics, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two Level 2 analgesic combinations in general practice. ⋯ Acute pain should not be understood as a single entity but as multiple entities with specific characteristics related to its underlying origin. Furthermore, our data suggest that, as already demonstrated in clinical trials, Level 2 analgesia provides effective relief of acute pain in 'real life' conditions.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
A novel paracetamol 1,000 mg sustained release formulation vs conventional paracetamol 500 mg formulation in patients with fever and pain: a randomized noninferiority trial.
To compare the efficacy and safety of newly developed paracetamol 1,000 mg sustained release (SR) tablets (test product) with conventional paracetamol 500 mg tablets (reference product) in patients with fever and pain. ⋯ Both the formulations of paracetamol were clinically and statically equivalent. Paracetamol 1,000 mg SR formulation is noninferior to conventional paracetamol 500 mg tablets.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Efficacy and safety of 400 and 800 mg etodolac vs. 1,000 mg paracetamol in acute treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blind, crossover, multicenter, phase III clinical trial.
We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of etodolac, in acute migraine attacks in comparison with paracetamol (acetaminophen). ⋯ Our study showed that etodolac is a safe and effective alternative in acute migraine treatment and showed comparable efficacy to paracetamol 1,000 mg. Etodolac may be considered as an alternative option for acute treatment of migraine.
-
BMC emergency medicine · Jan 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyThe PanAM study: a multi-center, double-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority study of paracetamol versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in treating acute musculoskeletal trauma.
Acute musculoskeletal trauma, including strains, sprains or contusions, occur frequently. Pain management is a crucial component of treatment. However, there is no convincing evidence which drug is superior in managing pain in these patients. The aim of the PanAM Study is to compare analgesic efficacy of three strategies of pain management: paracetamol, diclofenac, or a combination of both in patients with acute musculoskeletal trauma. ⋯ With this multi-center randomized clinical trial we will investigate whether treatment with paracetamol alone is not inferior to diclofenac alone or a combination of both drugs in adult patients with acute musculoskeletal trauma. The main relevance of the trial is to demonstrate the benefits and risks of three commonly used treatment regimens for musculoskeletal trauma. Data that lead to the prevention of severe Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs-related adverse effects might be gathered.
-
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol · Jan 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyScottish and Newcastle antiemetic pre-treatment for paracetamol poisoning study (SNAP).
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning remains the commonest cause of acute liver injury in Europe and North America. The intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) regimen introduced in the 1970s has continued effectively unchanged. This involves 3 different infusion regimens (dose and time) lasting over 20 hours. The same weight-related dose of NAC is used irrespective of paracetamol dose. Complications include frequent nausea and vomiting, anaphylactoid reactions and dosing errors. We designed a randomised controlled study investigating the efficacy of antiemetic pre-treatment (ondansetron) using standard NAC and a modified, shorter, regimen. ⋯ This study is primarily designed to test the efficacy of prophylactic anti-emetic therapy with ondansetron, but is the first attempt to formally examine new methods of administering IV NAC in paracetamol overdose. We anticipate, from volunteer studies, that nausea and vomiting will be less frequent with the new NAC regimen. In addition as anaphylactoid response appears related to plasma concentrations of both NAC and paracetamol anaphylactoid reactions should be less likely. This study is not powered to assess the relative efficacy of the two NAC regimens, however it will give useful information to power future studies. As the first formal randomised clinical trial in this patient group in over 30 years this study will also provide information to support further studies in patients in paracetamol overdose, particularly, when linked with modern novel biomarkers of liver damage, patients at different toxicity risk.