Articles: cations.
-
Different anatomical structures and pathophysiological functions can be responsible for lumbar pain, each producing a distinctive clinical profile. Pain can arise from the intervertebral disc, either acutely as a primary disc related disorder, or as result of the degradation associated with chronic internal disc disruption. In either case, greatest pain provocation will be associated with movements and functions in the sagittal plane. ⋯ Either of these conditions will produce the greatest pain provocation during three-dimensional movements, due to maximal stress to either the synovium or joint cartilage. Finally, patients can experience different symptoms associated with irritation to the dural sleeve, dorsal root ganglion, or chemically irritated lumbar nerve root. Differential diagnosis of these conditions requires a thorough examination and provides information that can assist the clinician in selecting appropriate management strategies.
-
Pain may begin in the periphery with activation of nociceptor transducers. The present article reviews the pharmacology of drug action at the level of the primary afferent by discussing the following: [1] agents which block transduction processes (vanilloids, sodium ion channel blockers, antiserotonergic agents, antipurinergic agents); [2] agents inhibiting the transducer site (opioids, cannabinoids, alpha adrenergic agents); [3] agents blocking transducer-based modulation processes (anti-inflammatories, antikinin agents, antitachykinins); and [4] agents which block primary afferent-related modification processes (antineurotrophins). There is a clear role for many of these agents in the treatment of inflammatory pain and they have potential benefits for neuropathic pain with peripheral triggers.
-
The objective of this international, multicenter, open-label trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of up to 12 months of therapy with transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) fentanyl in patients (n = 532) with chronic noncancer pain. The trial was completed by 301 (57%) of the patients. The main outcome measures were pain control assessment, global treatment satisfaction, patient preference for TTS fentanyl, and quality of life. ⋯ It was preferred by the majority of patients compared with their previous opioid medication. Overall, long-term treatment with TDF was generally well tolerated, particularly in view of the low incidence of potentially serious side effects such as drug abuse/dependence and respiratory depression. However, at present, it is important that patients receiving TDF should still be subject to careful assessment and monitoring.
-
Recent reports of provocative discography not only instill confusion, but also create numerous questions about its value in evaluating low back pain. It was reported that provocative discography produced pain in patients who were not suffering with low back pain but suffering with somatization disorder and depression. This study was designed to evaluate 50 randomly assigned patients, with 25 patients in Group I without somatization disorder and 25 patients in Group II with diagnosis of somatization disorder. ⋯ Any other response, with or without pain, was considered negative. Results showed positive provocative discography in 46% of the patients in the somatization group compared to 54% in the non-somatization group; in 46% of patients with depression compared to 54% of patients without depression; in 15 of 30 patients with generalized anxiety disorder; in 11 of 20 patients without generalized anxiety disorder; and in 42% of patients with combined somatization and depression, with negative discography in 58% of the patients. It is concluded that provocative discography provides similar results in patients with or without somatization, with or without depression, with somatization but with or without depression or with other combinations of the psychological triad of somatization disorder, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder.
-
Chronic low back pain and obesity are two common medical conditions. Obesity has been associated with symptoms such as adverse fat distribution and multiple secondary disorders, including low back pain. Obesity is defined as being 30% over ideal weight, which influences normal body mechanics as well as recovery from an injury. ⋯ The results showed that the prevalence rate of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain in Group I or nonobese patients was 36%, in contrast to 40% in Group II, or the obese patient group, with no significant differences among the two groups. The study also showed a false-positive rate of 39% in the total sample, or 44% in Group I nonobese patients and 33% in Group II, or obese patients. It is concluded that the prevalence of lumbar facet joint mediated pain of 40% in obese patients and 36% in patients of normal weight with a false-positive rate of 33% in obese patients and 44% in nonobese patients is similar to the results of multiple previous studies concluding that facet joint mediated pain is a common occurrence in obese patients; however, the incidence of facet joint mediated pain is similar in obese patients and nonobese patients.