Articles: microvascular-decompression-surgery.
-
Neurosurgical review · Apr 2013
Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: long-term outcome and prognostic factors, with emphasis on delayed cure.
The postoperative course of microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS) is variable, and the optimal time for assessing the results is unclear. From April 1997 to October 2007, MVD for HFS was performed in 801 patients. Patients were divided into two groups (cured or failed) according to subjective patient assessments over a 3-year period. ⋯ Intraoperative resolution of the lateral spread response (LSR) after decompression (p = 0.048) and severe indentation (p = 0.038) were significant predictors of good long-term outcome after MVD for HFS. In our series, 70 patients (8.7 %) had residual or recurrent spasms more than 1 year after surgery, of which 12 (17.1 %) improved gradually after 1 year. If the surgeon can confirm intraoperative resolution of the LSR and severe indentation, reoperation can be delayed until 3 years after MVD.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Apr 2013
Incidence of high-frequency hearing loss after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and discuss the pathogenesis of high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) after microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS). ⋯ High-frequency hearing loss occurs in a significant number of patients following MVD surgery for HFS. Drill-induced noise and transient loss of CSF during surgery may impair hearing in the high-frequency ranges on both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides, with the ipsilateral side being more affected. Changes in intraoperative BAEPs during MVD for HFS were not useful in predicting HFHL. Follow-up studies and repeat audiological examinations may be helpful in evaluating the time course and prognosis of HFHL. Prospective studies focusing on decreasing intraoperative noise exposure, as well as auditory shielding devices, will establish causation and allow the team to intervene appropriately to decrease the risk of HFHL.
-
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), one of the most intense forms of facial pain, has been the subject of great clinical interest. Significant advances have been made in its management, including surgical treatment and imaging of the trigeminal nerve and associated neurovascular compression. The different options for surgical treatment, recent advances in each as well as novel methods of imaging of the trigeminal nerve focusing on diffusion tensor imaging/tractography will be discussed.
-
The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, complications, and outcomes after the first microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with and without previous botulinum neurotoxin treatment for hemifacial spasm (HFS). ⋯ Microvascular decompression is an effective and safe procedure for patients with HFS previously treated using botulinum neurotoxin. Intraoperative monitoring with LSR is an effective tool for evaluating adequate decompression.
-
Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is an uncommon facial pain syndrome often misdiagnosed as trigeminal neuralgia. The rarity of this condition and its overlap with other cranial nerve hyperactivity syndromes often leads to a significant delay in diagnosis. The surgical procedures with the highest rates of pain relief for GPN are rhizotomy and microvascular decompression (MVD) of cranial nerves IX and X. ⋯ A review of the literature reveals that although the addition of cranial nerve X rhizotomy may improve the chances of long-term pain control, this maneuver also increases the risk of permanent dysphagia and vocal cord paralysis. The risks of this procedure have to be carefully weighed against its benefits. Based on the authors' experience, careful patient selection with a thorough exploratory operation most often leads to identification of the site of vascular conflict, obviating the need for cranial nerve X rhizotomy.