Articles: pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Oral nalbuphine for the treatment of pain after dental extractions.
A randomized, double-blind comparison of nalbuphine 30 mg or 60 mg by mouth and dihydrocodeine 30 mg by mouth was conducted in 75 patients with moderate to severe pain after surgery for dental extractions under general anaesthesia. A significant reduction in pain intensity followed each treatment and persisted throughout the 4-h observation period after nalbuphine, but only for 3 h after dihydrocodeine was given. ⋯ However, the patients who received nalbuphine 30 mg had a significantly higher mean pain intensity before treatment than those in the other groups. The side-effects encountered were those typical of opioid medication; there were no statistically significant differences between the groups.
-
Bull. Tokyo Med. Dent. Univ. · Sep 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialRelationship between subjective pain estimation and somatosensory evoked potentials by electrical tooth stimulation.
The relationship between the amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and the subjective pain estimation using a visual analogue scale (VAS) was examined in 8 volunteers undergoing randomized electrical tooth stimulation with 3 different intensities. Randomized stimulation was used instead of repetitive stimulation with a fixed intensity in order to minimize the phenomena of habituation and expectancy in recording the SEP and VAS. The VAS scores increased significantly with the stimulus intensity. ⋯ There was a significant correlation between the amplitude of N160-P300 and the VAS scores. These findings indicate that the component between 160 and 300 msec reflects the perceived pain intensity and the psychological evaluation processes such as cognition, meaning, interpretation and appreciation of pain. The method of randomized stimulation can serve as a simple and useful way for the objective or subjective pain estimation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of acute postoperative pain.
Twenty patients undergoing decompressive lumbar laminectomy were randomly allocated, in a double-blind manner, to receive active or inactive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as part of the management of their postoperative pain. All patients received the same non-narcotic general anaesthetic. The efficacy of the TENS was assessed by using a patient-controlled analgesia system (PRODAC) which delivered morphine i.v. ⋯ In addition, plasma morphine concentrations were measured hourly for the first 6 h and again at 24 h. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the number of patient demands for analgesia, morphine dose or plasma morphine concentration. TENS offered no advantage over a placebo in the management of acute postoperative pain in these patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia: a comparison of plain solutions of tetracaine and bupivacaine.
The incidence of tourniquet pain was evaluated in 40 patients having orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities during spinal anesthesia using 15 mg of a plain solution of either 0.5% tetracaine or 0.5% bupivacaine. The drugs were administered in a randomized fashion, and measurement of the levels of sensory anesthesia to pinprick and motor blockade as well as the occurrence of tourniquet pain were made by an independent blinded observer. The onset and maximum cephalad spread of sensory anesthesia and the onset and degree of motor block were similar in both groups of patients. ⋯ The occurrence of tourniquet pain was not related to the level of sensory anesthesia, because patients in the tetracaine group had a higher level of sensory anesthesia (mean T6) than did patients in the bupivacaine group (mean T10) at the onset of tourniquet pain. It is speculated that during spinal anesthesia both A and C fibers (mediating fast and slow pain, respectively) are initially equally inhibited. However, as the concentration of local anesthetic in the cerebrospinal fluid declines, C fibers may become unblocked earlier with tetracaine than A fibers, resulting in tourniquet pain in the presence of an otherwise satisfactory spinal anesthetic.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Assessment of the analgesic efficacy of nefopam hydrochloride after upper abdominal surgery: a study using patient controlled analgesia.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to assess the analgesic efficacy of intramuscular nefopam hydrochloride after upper abdominal surgery. Patients received either 20 mg nefopam (n = 23) or matching placebo (n = 26), 90 min before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 6, 12 and 18 h after the end of surgery. The 24-h morphine requirements were measured using a patient-controlled analgesia system delivering on-demand intravenous bolus doses of morphine. ⋯ After 24 h the consumptions were 44.1 +/- 7.2 mg and 62.5 +/- 6.9 mg respectively (P less than 0.05). The pain scores in both groups were similar. This study confirms that nefopam hydrochloride has significant analgesic effects and would be a useful supplement to morphine in the management of postoperative pain.