Articles: pain.
-
Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. · Feb 1983
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Effect of orphenadrine/paracetamol combination tablets (Norgesic) on myalgia. A double-blind comparative study using a placebo in general practice].
-
Fortschritte der Medizin · Feb 1983
[Sublingual buprenorphine tablets: initial clinical experiences in long-term therapy of cancer pain].
Buprenorphine sublingual tablets (0.2 mg) were investigated in therapy of cancer pain. In 67 patients there was a good analgetic effect in 60%, even in those cases treated with other opiates before. The induction time was quite long (60 min.) but is no problem in chronic administration. ⋯ Typical opiate-side-effects were registered and well tolerated after some days' treatment. There was no respiratory depression. Buprenorphine sublingual tablets are certainly a good alternative in orally available opioids.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Feb 1983
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPostoperative analgesia for haemorrhoid surgery.
Seventy patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of five treatment groups in order to compare the effectiveness of various caudal agents in the control of postoperative pain. Four groups were given a caudal injection of either 2% lignocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, 2% lignocaine + morphine sulphate 4 mg or normal saline + morphine sulphate 4 mg, while the fifth (control) group did not receive an injection. The number of patients requiring postoperative opiates was significantly higher in the lignocaine group than in the morphine (p less than 0.05) and morphine-lignocaine (p less than 0.05) groups. ⋯ In those who received opiates, the mean analgesic period was 228 minutes in the control group, and was significantly longer following bupivacaine (577 min, p less than 0.01), morphine-lignocaine (637 min, p less than 0.05) and morphine (665 min, p less than 0.0). The mean analgesic period following lignocaine (349 min) was not significantly different from control. The incidence of catheterisation was lowest in those patients who did not receive caudal analgesia.