Articles: anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurane or isoflurane for adult ambulatory anesthesia. The Sevoflurane Multicenter Ambulatory Group.
Sevoflurane was compared with isoflurane in 246 adult ASA class I-III patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. After administration of midazolam 1-2 mg and fentanyl 1 microgram/kg, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and maintained with either sevoflurane or isoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide to maintain arterial blood pressure at +/- 20% of baseline. Fresh gas flows were 10 L/min during induction and 5 L/min during maintenance. ⋯ Sevoflurane patients had significantly lower incidences of postoperative somnolence (15% vs 26%) and of nausea both in the PACU (36% vs 51%) and in the 24-h postdischarge period (9% vs 24%). Patient satisfaction was high overall (sevoflurane 97%, isoflurane 93%). We conclude that sevoflurane is a useful inhaled anesthetic for maintenance of ambulatory anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialA multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery.
Remifentanil is a mu-opioid receptor agonist with a context sensitive half-time of 3 min and an elimination half-life < or = 10 min. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of remifentanil and propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in 161 patients undergoing inpatient surgery. Remifentanil 1 microgram/kg was given intravenously (i.v.) followed by one of two randomized infusion rates: small dose (0.5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) or large dose (1 microgram.kg-1.min-1). ⋯ The most frequent adverse events were hypotension (systolic blood pressure [BP] < 80 mm Hg or mean BP < 60 mm Hg) during anesthesia induction (10% small-dose versus 15% large-dose group; P = not significant [NS]) and hypotension (27% small-dose versus 30% large-dose group; P = NS), and bradycardia (7% small-dose versus 19% large-dose group; P = NS) during maintenance. In conclusion, when combined with propofol 75 micrograms.kg-1.min-1, remifentanil 1 microgram/kg i.v. as a bolus followed by an infusion of 1.0 microgram.kg-1.min-1 effectively controls responses to tracheal intubation. After tracheal intubation, remifentanil 0.25-4.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 effectively controlled intraoperative responses while allowing for rapid emergence from anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0.5%, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
Ropivacaine is a new long-acting, injectable local anaesthetic currently undergoing clinical investigation world wide. It is structurally very similar to bupivacaine, but with less potential for central nervous system or cardiac toxicity. The purpose of this double-blind study was: to investigate the dose-response relationship of increasing doses of ropivacaine on the quality of anaesthesia and the duration of both motor and sensory blockade, and to compare these results with an established local anaesthetic, bupivacaine. ⋯ Increasing doses of ropivacaine were associated with an increased clinical effect. The most consistent differences occurred when ropivacaine 1.0% was compared with 0.5% and the least consistent between ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5%. The main difference between ropivacaine 1.0% and bupivacaine was in sensory duration. No serious adverse events were reported.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients.
A randomized, prospective study was performed at four institutions to compare anesthetic induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics between sevoflurane- and propofol-based anesthesia in 186 ASA physical status I and 11 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures of 1-3 h. Group 1 (n = 93) patients received sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia while Group 2 (n = 93) received propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation times were significantly shorter with propofol (2.21 +/- 0.2 min, 5.11 +/- 0.3 min, respectively) than with sevoflurane (3.11 +/- 0.2 min, 7.21 +/- 0.3 min, respectively). ⋯ The incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain-discomfort scores were similar between the two groups. Urinary specific gravity decreased in the sevoflurane-treated group while serum creatinine and urinary pH were unchanged from preoperative values in both groups. Sevoflurane compared favorably with propofol when used for anesthesia for elective procedures of 1-3 h duration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1996
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialA pilot study of the effects of a perflubron emulsion, AF 0104, on mixed venous oxygen tension in anesthetized surgical patients.
A pilot study of a perfluorochemical (PFC) emulsion was undertaken to determine whether administration of a perflubron emulsion could result in measurable changes in mixed venous oxygen tension. Seven adult surgical patients received a 0.9-g PFC/kg intravenous dose of perflubron emulsion after acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH). Hemodynamic and oxygen transport data were collected before and after ANH, immediately after PFC infusion, and at approximate 15-min intervals throughout the surgical period. ⋯ As surgery progressed, the hemoglobin concentration decreased with ongoing blood loss while PVO2 values remained at or above predosing levels. Peak perflubron blood levels were 0.8 g/dL immediately postinfusion, and approximately 0.3 g/dL at 1 h. This pilot study demonstrates that administration of perflubron emulsion results in measurable changes in mixed venous oxygen tension during intraoperative ANH.