Articles: anesthesia.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialEffect of intravenous flumazenil on reversal of the central effects of midazolam used with short-acting opioids for general anesthesia in hospitalized patients: report of a multicenter, double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Hospitalized Patients Study Group I.
Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine central nervous system (CNS) depressant widely used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, is often supplemented with short-acting opioids for general anesthesia. Administered postoperatively, flumazenil, a specific benzodiazepine antagonist, reverses the CNS sedative effects of midazolam. In a double-blind clinical trial in hospitalized patients, flumazenil, administered postoperatively at an average intravenous dose of 0.89 mg (range: 0.4 mg to 1 mg), was more effective than placebo in reversing sedation and other residual effects of benzodiazepines in patients recovering from general anesthesia induced by midazolam (mean dose 29 mg) in conjunction with fentanyl (mean dose 0.4 mg) or sufentanil (mean dose 0.056 mg). ⋯ Measurements of psychomotor function and memory also showed significant between-group differences. Flumazenil, compared with placebo, was not associated with a substantially greater frequency of operative-site pain. These results demonstrate that the efficacy and safety of flumazenil were not compromised by the addition of a short-acting opioid to the anesthetic regimen.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: I. Description of methods and populations.
The objectives of this study were first to develop and institute a methodology for the study of anaesthetic outcome for parallel use in four teaching hospitals in Canada and second, to compare rates of morbidity and mortality associated with anaesthesia between the four centres. The basic design of the study was occurrence screening with anaesthetists entering data on patient demographics, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Research nurses reviewed anaesthetic records and hospital charts and interviewed patients postoperatively. ⋯ There were major differences found across the hospitals, particularly with regard to volume, patient case-mix, anaesthetic drugs and monitoring used. The use of parallel training, repeated consultations and use of rounds and inservices contributed to the reliability and validity of the data collection. We conclude that outcome surveillance can be instituted in different hospital Departments of Anaesthesia with sufficient confidence to form the basis of comparison of anaesthetic outcome.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: III. Are anaesthetic complications predictable in day surgical practice?
To understand better the factors important to the safety of anaesthesia provided for day surgical procedures, we analyzed the intraoperative and immediate postoperative course of patients at four Canadian teaching hospitals' day treatment centres. After excluding those who received only monitored anaesthesia care, there were 6,914 adult (non-obstetrical) patients seen over a twelve-month period in 1988-89. The rate of adverse outcome consequent to their care was identified by a comprehensive surveillance system which included review of anaesthetic records (four hospitals) and follow-up telephone calls (two hospitals). ⋯ Patients judged obese, or inadequately fasted, were found to experience a greater rate of recovery problems as well as discomfort. While the low response rate (36%) to the telephone interviews created a sampling bias, the high rate of patient dissatisfaction among those reached is disconcerting. We conclude that day surgical patients with preoperative medical conditions, even when optimally managed, are at higher risk for adverse events in the perioperative period.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: II. Can outcomes be used to assess the quality of anaesthesia care?
Since anaesthesia, unlike medical or surgical specialties, does not constitute treatment, this study sought to determine if methods used to assess medical or surgical outcomes (that is the determination of adverse outcome) are applicable to anaesthesia. Anaesthetists collected information on patient, surgical and anaesthetic factors while data on recovery room and postoperative events were evaluated by research nurses. Data on 27,184 inpatients were collected and the analysis of outcomes determined for the intraoperative, post-anaesthetic care unit and postoperative time periods. ⋯ Possible reasons to account for these variations in outcome include compliance in recording events, inadequate case-mix adjustment, differences in interpretation of the variables (despite guidelines) and institutional differences in monitoring, charting and observation protocols. The authors conclude that measuring quality of care in anaesthesia by comparing major outcomes is unsatisfactory since the contribution of anaesthesia to perioperative outcomes is uncertain and that variations may be explained by institutional differences which are beyond the control of the anaesthetist. It is suggested that minor adverse events, particularly those of concern to the patient, should be the next focus for quality improvement in anaesthesia.
-
Anesth Pain Control Dent · Jan 1992
Multicenter StudyProtocol for studying depth of anesthesia using the spectral edge frequency.
The preliminary results of a multicenter study designed to determine the utility of the processed EEG in combination with heart rate and blood pressure for estimating anesthetic depth are reported. The study is planned to include 1,000 ASA I, II, and III patients undergoing surgery with at least a 60-minute duration of anesthesia. The preliminary results indicate that the use of EEG and clinical signs may provide better control of anesthetic depth. The study design provides ideal conditions for determining whether spectral edge frequency is a useful criterion for management of routine general anesthesia in a typical clinical environment.