Articles: critical-illness.
-
Critical care medicine · Sep 2006
Multicenter StudySix-year mortality and quality of life in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
To study the mortality and quality of life (QOL) of survivors at 6 yrs after intensive care unit (ICU) admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ⋯ The 6-yr mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring ICU admission is high. Mortality is mainly influenced by pre-ICU admission QOL. At 6 yrs, at least 15% are alive; survivors have a worse QOL compared with pre-ICU admission, although three quarters of them are self-sufficient.
-
Multicenter Study
Practice of expert critical care nurses in situations of prognostic conflict at the end of life.
Prolonging the living-dying process with inappropriate treatment is a profoundly disturbing ethical issue for nurses in many practice areas, including the intensive care unit. Despite the frequent occurrence of such distressing events, research suggests that critical care nurses assume a limited role in end-of-life decision making and care planning. ⋯ The transition from curative to end-of-life care in the intensive care unit is often fraught with ambiguity and anguish. The expert nurses demonstrated the ability and willingness to actively protect and advocate for their vulnerable patients even in situations in which the nurses' actions did not influence the outcomes.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Understanding cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making: perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients and family members.
To improve communication and decision making related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a greater understanding of the perspectives of hospitalized patients with advanced diseases and their family members are needed. ⋯ Seriously ill hospitalized patients have poor knowledge about CPR, and variable preferences for deliberation and their role in the decision-making process regarding their treatment. Strategies that improve understanding of CPR and foster discussions that involve patients, family members, and physicians in the decision-making process may improve the quantity and quality of communication and decision making about CPR.
-
Health Technol Assess · Aug 2006
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative StudyAn evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in patient management in intensive care: a systematic review and a randomised controlled trial.
To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of managing critically ill patients in adult, general intensive care with or without pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). ⋯ Clinical management of critically ill patients with a PAC, as currently practised in the UK, neither improves hospital survival for adult, general intensive care patients nor reduces length of stay in hospital. The lack of demonstrable benefit from a device previously believed to be beneficial could be explained by statistical chance, by misinterpretation of PAC-derived data, by ineffective treatment strategies based on data correctly interpreted using the current paradigm or by subsequent inaction following insertion of the device. It is also possible that detailed data on haemodynamics, however used, cannot modify the disease process sufficiently to influence disease outcome. The economic evaluation, using decision analysis techniques rather than conventional hypothesis testing, suggests that the withdrawal of the PAC from routine clinical practice in the NHS would be considered cost-effective in the current decision-making climate, and might result in lives or life-years being saved at modest cost. With the declining use of PACs in the UK and the findings of this report indicating no overall benefit from management with a PAC, it should now be possible to examine protocolised management with a PAC in selected groups of critically ill patients against appropriate controls, something that was difficult while PACs were the considered standard of care.
-
Multicenter Study
[Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial infections in critically ill patients admitted in intensive care units].
To investigate the frequency of nosocomial infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill patients admitted to Spanish intensive care units (ICUs) and to describe the characteristics and outcome of patients in whom this pathogen was isolated. ⋯ S. aureus was isolated in 19.8% of patients with ICU-acquired infection, particularly in relation to pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Mortality in patients with S. aureus infection was higher than that in patients with infections due to other microorganisms and patients without infection. In contrast, differences in the outcome of patients with infections caused by methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant S. aureus were not found.