Articles: critical-illness.
-
Critical care clinics · Jul 1996
ReviewNutrition support is not beneficial and can be harmful in critically ill patients.
The introductory remark by Lucretius serves as a reminder that nutrient intake can have very different consequences in different subjects. In the patient with an acute or serious illness, metabolic derangements can transform a substance that is normally a source of energy into a source of metabolic toxins. The potential for organic nutrients to become organic toxins in the diseased host is a phenomenon that deserves more attention in the debate about the value of nutrition support in critically ill patients.
-
Increasing DO2 to supranormal levels, spontaneously or therapeutically, correlates with better survival in the critically ill patient, but not all patients who attain a DO2I greater than 600 mL/min/m2 survive. Conversely, there is often a 50% or greater survival rate in patients who do not reach normal DO2I values. No investigator has been able to show an incremental increase in survival with increasing DO2I; but studies have shown improved survival rates with increasing SVO2. ⋯ SVO2 should be normalized when low, again by increasing DO2. Data continue to support clinical interventions aimed at optimizing DO2. Does increasing DO2 increase the survival rates of critically ill patients? Sometimes.
-
Critically ill patients invariably require nutritional intervention. Traditionally, enteral nutrition has not been widely employed in this patient population. This is due in part to the success of present-day parenteral nutrition, and to difficulties encountered with enteral feeding. ⋯ Enterally administered nutritional support can and should be utilised as the preferred route of nourishment for the critically ill. The appropriate choice of access and formula, as well as a rational strategy for implementation, should improve the likelihood of success. This article describes the unique features of critical illness as they pertain to nutritional support, the benefits of enteral nutrition, and the obstacles to success, and offers suggestions which may improve the ability to provide nutrients adequately via the intestinal tract.
-
Comparative Study
Do-not-resuscitate practices in the chronically critically ill.
To determine the frequency of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in the chronically critically ill; to identify the differences in clinical and demographic characteristics of chronically critically ill patients who have DNR orders and those who do not; to identify the differences in the cost of care between patients with and without DNR orders; and to identify the differences in DNR practices between an experimental special care unit and the traditional intensive care unit (ICU). ⋯ There was no difference in the frequency of DNR orders between the special care unit versus the intensive care unit--although patients in the special care unit had a longer interval between hospital admission and initiation of the DNR order. DNR patients differed from non-DNR in that they were older, less likely to be married, and had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission to the study. The mortality rate in the DNR group was 71% versus 6% in the non-DNR group. There was no difference in total costs. DNR patients were also more likely to have an impaired mental status on admission, and more likely to have deterioration in mental status by the time of discharge than the non-DNR patients.