Articles: burns.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA randomized single-blind evaluation of a discharge teaching book for pediatric patients with burns.
To evaluate the influence of a modular, multidisciplinary, pediatric burn discharge book on burn-care-related knowledge and satisfaction of caregivers, we studied children less than 17 years of age admitted with an acute thermal injury to the pediatric burn unit of a large, tertiary care hospital in Winnipeg, Canada over a 32 month period. Demographic characteristics of the population are similar to published profiles of other pediatric burn units with the exception that North American Indian (NAI) families were disproportionately admitted, with 59 out of the 123 (48%) admissions from a geographic area that has less than 15% NAIs. We randomly assigned the families to receive discharge instructions with the book (intervention group) or routine discharge teaching without the book (comparison group). ⋯ A positive correlation (p < 0.05) was found with having English as the first language, having a child with more extensive burns, having a younger age of the child with burns, and having fewer children in the home. In conclusion, we found that the discharge book improved the burn-care-related knowledge of caregivers. However, other factors, particularly ethnic and language background, were of greater influence.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative assessment of cultured skin substitutes and native skin autograft for treatment of full-thickness burns.
Comparison of cultured skin substitutes (CSSs) and split-thickness autograft (STAG) was performed to assess whether the requirement for autologous skin grafts may be reduced in the treatment of massive burns. ⋯ These results suggest that outcome of engrafted CSSs is not different from STAG and that increased incidence of regrafting is related to decreased percentage of initial engraftment. Increased rates of engraftment of CSSs may lead to improved outcome for closure of burn wounds, allow greater availability of materials for grafting, and reduce requirements for donor skin autograft.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Sep 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialProspective, randomized study of the efficacy of pressure garment therapy in patients with burns.
A randomized, prospective study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of pressure garment therapy in patients with burns. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either pressure garment therapy or no pressure garment therapy. ⋯ Eight of the patients receiving pressure garment therapy and nine receiving no pressure garment therapy were not involved in the follow-up. No significant differences were found between the two groups when age, body surface area burn, length of hospital stay, or time to wound maturation were compared.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Maintenance of serum albumin levels in pediatric burn patients: a prospective, randomized trial.
A prospective, randomized trial was performed to determine whether maintaining serum albumin levels in burned pediatric patients had any effect on morbidity and mortality. Patients < 19 years of age with burns > 20% total body surface area were randomized to receive supplemental albumin to maintain levels 2.5 to 3.5 g/dL ("High Albumin") or were given albumin only if levels dropped < 1.5 g/dL ("Low Albumin") after completing burn shock resuscitation. The 36 patients in the Low Albumin group were well matched for age, burn size, depth of injury, and inhalation injury when compared with the High Albumin group (34 patients). ⋯ No differences in hematology, electrolytes, or nutritional laboratories were found. Finally, length of stay, complication rate, and mortality were not affected by albumin treatment. Albumin supplementation to maintain normal serum levels does not seem to be warranted in previously healthy children who suffer severe burns and who receive adequate nutrition.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A prospective randomized trial of absorbable staple fixation of skin grafts for burn wound coverage.
A prospective randomized trial of absorbable versus metal skin staples for securing skin grafts to excised burn wounds was performed in 20 patients. The absorbable staples were easy to use and efficacious in securing the skin grafts, except to edematous fatty tissue. ⋯ A decrease of 61.4 minutes of the most significantly painful portion of the postoperative dressing change (i.e., staple removal) would have been avoided by using absorbable staples. The overall cost of using the absorbable staples for small burns was comparable with metal staples; however, the cost difference was significantly greater for large burns.