Articles: nausea.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialInfluence of promethazine on symptom-therapy scores for nausea during patient-controlled analgesia with morphine.
We assessed whether adding promethazine to the syringe containing morphine for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) decreases nausea after gynecologic surgery. Patients were assigned randomly to receive PCA (morphine 1.5 mg, 6-min lockout interval) with or without promethazine (0.625 mg/PCA dose, providing an average of 17.6 mg/24 h). ⋯ However, symptom-therapy scores differed significantly, with median values of 0 and 2, respectively, for the promethazine-treated and control groups. We conclude that simultaneous titration of morphine and promethazine decreases nausea associated with PCA therapy; the difference may best be appreciated with use of the combined symptom-therapy score.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Gastrointestinal side effects of intravenous erythromycin: incidence and reduction with prolonged infusion time and glycopyrrolate pretreatment.
To determine the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity due to intravenous (IV) erythromycin and to attempt to decrease this toxicity by prolonging the infusion time of erythromycin and/or pretreating with the peripheral anticholinergic, glycopyrrolate 0.1 mg IV. ⋯ Gastrointestinal toxicity associated with the IV infusion of erythromycin is common and is more likely to occur in younger patients. A 1-hour infusion of erythromycin combined with pretreatment with glycopyrrolate, 0.1 mg IV, is effective in reducing this toxicity.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Hypnosis or cognitive behavioral training for the reduction of pain and nausea during cancer treatment: a controlled clinical trial.
Few controlled clinical trials have tested the efficacy of psychological techniques for reducing cancer pain or post-chemotherapy nausea and emesis. In this study, 67 bone marrow transplant patients with hematological malignancies were randomly assigned to one of four groups prior to beginning transplantation conditioning: (1) hypnosis training (HYP); (2) cognitive behavioral coping skills training (CB); (3) therapist contact control (TC); or (4) treatment as usual (TAU; no treatment control). Patients completed measures of physical functioning (Sickness Impact Profile; SIP) and psychological functioning (Brief Symptom Inventory; BSI), which were used as covariates in the analyses. ⋯ Risk, SIP, and BSI pre-transplant were found to be effective predictors of inpatient physical symptoms. Nausea, emesis and opioid use did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. The cognitive behavioral intervention, as applied in this study, was not effective in reducing the symptoms measured.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a retrospective comparison of alfentanil versus sufentanil.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting have been associated with the use of intravenous narcotics, and nitrous oxide may worsen the emetic effects of narcotics. Alfentanil and sufentanil are two synthetic derivatives of fentanyl; alfentanil has a shorter wake-up time than fentanyl, and sufentanil is equivalent to fentanyl. In order to study comparative emetic properties of these two drugs, patients in two different cities were randomly allocated to two different groups and retrospectively compared. ⋯ With group I, the overall incidence of nausea was 31% and of vomiting was 6.2%. For group II, the overall rate for nausea was 38.2% and 8.8% for vomiting. Statistically, there was no significant difference in nausea or vomiting between groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis in patients responding poorly to previous antiemetic therapy. Comparing tropisetron with optimised standard antiemetic therapy.
In a multicentre trial, 78 patients with a variety of malignancies, who had experienced insufficient control of emesis (greater than or equal to 3 episodes within 24 hours) while receiving standard antiemetics during previous chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive tropisetron 5mg once daily for 5 days or conventional antiemetic drugs. No attempt was made to standardise the conventional antiemetic treatment, which was given according to the usual practice of the participating institutions. Emesis was evaluated by counting emetic episodes and nausea by asking the patients to record on a diary chart the duration and severity of the nausea. ⋯ The superior efficacy of tropisetron was especially marked during the first 24 hours. For delayed nausea, no significant difference between treatments was seen. No serious adverse effects were observed.