Articles: brain-injuries.
-
Top Magn Reson Imaging · Jan 1993
ReviewNeuroradiologic evaluation of pediatric craniocerebral trauma.
Although cranial computed tomography (CT) remains the initial diagnostic test in the evaluation and triage of the pediatric head-injury patient, magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) has become the next step in the diagnostic evaluation of those with focal or diffuse neurologic deficits. MRI is better able to demonstrate the extent and location of both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic injury, thereby providing prognostic information. In nonaccidental head injury, MRI has proved valuable in detecting subtle subacute contusions and even not so subtle chronic subdural hematomas that may be difficult to see on CT or that can mimic enlargement of the subarachnoid space on CT.
-
A prospective study of 315 consecutive patients with a severe head injury was undertaken to study factors contributing to mortality and morbidity, both in the pre-hospital and hospital phases. Entry criteria were a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less after non-surgical resuscitation within 6 h of the injury, or a deterioration to that level within 48 h. Patients with gunshot wounds or who were dead on arrival were excluded. ⋯ When analysed using logistic regression, the most accurate model (accuracy 84.4%) included increasing age, abnormal motor responses and the three CT indicators. Analysis of the data for 'good' (Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) 1 and 2) vs 'poor' (GOS 3 and 4) survival at 6 months was also performed using logistic regression. The model which provided the most accurate prediction of poor outcome included age, hypotension and three different CT characteristics, subarachnoid blood, intracerebral haematoma or intracerebral contusion (accuracy 72.5%).
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Jan 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA phase II study of moderate hypothermia in severe brain injury.
Forty-six patients with severe nonpenetrating brain injury [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 4-7] were randomized to standard management at 37 degrees C (n = 22) and to standard management with systemic hypothermia to 32 to 33 degrees C (n = 24). The two groups were balanced in terms of age (Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p > 0.95), randomizing GCS (chi-square test, p = 0.54), and primary diagnosis. Cooling was begun within 6 h of injury by use of cooling blankets. ⋯ Sepsis was seen more commonly in the hypothermia group, but difference was not statistically significant (chi-square test). Mean Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3 months after injury showed an absolute increase of 16% (i.e., 36.4-52.2%) in the number of patients in the Good Recovery/Moderate Disability (GR/MD) category as compared with Severe Disability/Vegetative/Dead (SD/V/D) (chi-square test, p > 0.287). Based on evidence of improved neurologic outcome with minimal toxicity, we believe that phase III testing of moderate systemic hypothermia in patients with severe head injury is warranted.