• Hirokazu Takai, Kazutaka Mizuta, Masatoshi Murayama, Daisuke Nakayama, Sakumo Kii, Chihiro Hayai, and Tomoki Takahashi.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan. Electronic address: hirokazoid@hotmail.co.jp.
• Injury. 2020 Aug 1; 51 (8): 1840-1845.

IntroductionLag screw insertion into the ideal position is essential to obtain good results in open reduction and internal fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture. Tip-apex distance (TAD) is a widely adopted method for evaluating the risk of lag screw cut-out. Adaptive positioning technology (ADAPT) is a fluoroscopic computer-assisted surgery system that enables orthopaedic surgeons to guide the screw into a proper position intraoperatively. A randomized control study concluded that ADAPT resulted in excellent TAD. However, it was not significantly better than conventional methods when performed by fellowship-trained traumatologists. Therefore, we hypothesised that ADAPT would be useful to orthopaedic residents and evaluated this usefulness.MethodsWe reviewed 102 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture from May 2017 to March 2019 using Gamma-3 intertrochanteric nails. Two residents performed all procedures; 51 patients underwent surgery using ADAPT and the others underwent surgery without navigation. The number of attempts to drill guide-wire, operation time, lag screw insertion time, radiation exposure time, TAD, and lag screw position were evaluated for each surgeon.ResultsIn one resident, when using the ADAPT system, the number of attempts to drill guide-wire (p=0.001), lag screw insertion time (p=0.000), radiational exposure time (p=0.009) and TAD (p=0.007) were lower, and the percentage of ideal lag screw position (p=0.035) were better than that in the conventional method. However, there was no significant difference in the performance of another resident with respect to the aforementioned factors, whether using ADAPT or not.ConclusionOne resident showed better results with the ADAPT system than with conventional osteosynthesis. However, another resident received no benefit from ADAPT. The efficiency may not apply to everyone as individual competence can influence efficiency when using ADAPT system. Therefore, as a new device, it must be used cautiously because skill or experience may influence its use, especially by orthopaedic residents.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…