• CMAJ · Jul 2020

    Feasibility of a school-based vision screening program to detect undiagnosed visual problems in kindergarten children in Ontario.

    • Mayu Nishimura, Agnes Wong, Helen Dimaras, and Daphne Maurer.
    • Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Nishimura, Wong, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine (Wong, Dimaras), University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wong, Maurer), and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), Sick-Kids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour (Nishimura, Maurer), Faculty of Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. mayu.nishimura@sickkids.ca.
    • CMAJ. 2020 Jul 20; 192 (29): E822E831E822-E831.

    BackgroundVisual problems can negatively affect visual development and learning but often go undetected. We assessed the feasibility of scaling up a school-based screening program to identify and treat kindergarten children with visual problems.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study offering vision screening to junior (JK) and senior kindergarten (SK) children attending 43 schools in 15 Ontario communities. Screening comprised photoscreeners and tests of visual acuity, stereoacuity and eye alignment. Children who failed any test were referred for a comprehensive eye examination, with treatment as needed (e.g., glasses).ResultsUsing a passive consent model, 89% of children were screened compared with 62% using an active consent model (p < 0.001). Referral rates to an optometrist varied across schools (mean referral rate for children in JK 53%, range 25%-83%; mean referral rate for children in SK 34%, range 12%-61%). Among 4811 children who were screened, a visual problem was detected in 516 (10.7%), including 164 (3.4%) with amblyopia and 324 (6.7%) with clinically significant refractive errors. For 347 (67.2%) of the children with a visual problem, this was their first eye examination. Rescreening in Year 2 did not lead to detection of additional problems among children who passed screening in Year 1. Regardless of location (child's school or optometrist's office), 1563 (68.9%) of children attended the follow-up optometry examination. Most of the children who were surveyed (291 of 322, 90.4%) indicated that they enjoyed vision screening.InterpretationMany children in Ontario with a visual problem were not being identified by the status quo in 2015-2017. We found that in-school vision screening with follow-up eye examinations is an effective strategy for identifying at-risk children and placing them in eye care before grade 1.© 2020 Joule Inc. or its licensors.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…